search
top

Response to “The Secret History of Guns”

The Battle Swarm Blog recently asked Clayton Cramer to respond to Prof. Adam Winkler’s article “The Secret History of Guns,” and got a response. I recommend reading both. Professor Winkler is not a person I’d classify as part of our movement, but he’s made some useful contributions to the debate. I’d classify him as a moderate. Clayton Cramer has been citied in a number of Second Amendment cases, including Heller, McDonald, and Ezell.

2 Responses to “Response to “The Secret History of Guns””

  1. Arnie says:

    I’m embarrassed that I did not know that a federal 1792 law (Militia Act?) compelled private citizens to purchase arms. I would’ve curious if this applied only to those who volunteered to serve in the Article 1, sec 8 Select Militia (I. e. National Guard) and not the Amendment 2 general or enrolled militia (see also USC Title 10, Section 311, para. b, sub-paragraphs 1 and 2). I shallf the former, Winkler’s criticism holds no water. If the latter, he has a formidable criticism, indeed. I’ll try to find out.

  2. Arnie says:

    Sorry about the above typos. I was a bit rushed.

top