Comments on: Another Response from the Brady Folks http://www.pagunblog.com/2010/02/07/another-response-from-the-brady-folks/ The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ... Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:18:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ian Argent http://www.pagunblog.com/2010/02/07/another-response-from-the-brady-folks/#comment-57042 Ian Argent Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:28:37 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=16484#comment-57042 By continuing to confront the opponent it brings out their arguments. By continuing to confront the opponent it brings out their arguments.

]]> By: kaveman http://www.pagunblog.com/2010/02/07/another-response-from-the-brady-folks/#comment-57035 kaveman Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:20:36 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=16484#comment-57035 You are way too polite, sebastian, The Brady Bunch can smell their own death and they are seeking to cling to any rope of relevance. MAIG is the true threat now, the BC has been defeated. You are way too polite, sebastian,

The Brady Bunch can smell their own death and they are seeking to cling to any rope of relevance.

MAIG is the true threat now, the BC has been defeated.

]]> By: Sebastian http://www.pagunblog.com/2010/02/07/another-response-from-the-brady-folks/#comment-57031 Sebastian Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:08:23 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=16484#comment-57031 I know, it's surprising to me too. Really, from their point of view, they are best served by pretending i don't exist. I know, it’s surprising to me too. Really, from their point of view, they are best served by pretending i don’t exist.

]]> By: ChamberedRound http://www.pagunblog.com/2010/02/07/another-response-from-the-brady-folks/#comment-57028 ChamberedRound Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:53:10 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=16484#comment-57028 Sebastian, this is not at all meant to minimize your importance in the gun rights movement, but I find it surprising that the Brady Bunch seems so interested in your every word as of late. Seems like you may have touched a nerve. Sebastian, this is not at all meant to minimize your importance in the gun rights movement, but I find it surprising that the Brady Bunch seems so interested in your every word as of late. Seems like you may have touched a nerve.

]]> By: Joe Huffman http://www.pagunblog.com/2010/02/07/another-response-from-the-brady-folks/#comment-57020 Joe Huffman Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:57:38 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=16484#comment-57020 I use the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow" rel="nofollow">"rel=nofollow" attribute</a> in my links to their ilk. That takes care of the page rank issue. Convincing them isn't the point. Challenging and defeating their claims for other to see is. My latest shots in their direction are <a href="http://blog.joehuffman.org/2010/02/08/ACuturalIssue.aspx" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://blog.joehuffman.org/2010/02/08/DirectConfrontationWithTheBradyCampaign.aspx" rel="nofollow">here</a>. I use the “rel=nofollow” attribute in my links to their ilk. That takes care of the page rank issue.

Convincing them isn’t the point. Challenging and defeating their claims for other to see is.

My latest shots in their direction are here and here.

]]> By: ZK http://www.pagunblog.com/2010/02/07/another-response-from-the-brady-folks/#comment-57019 ZK Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:16:04 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=16484#comment-57019 You don't gain anything from engaging in a dialog with professional Brady employees, except to give more exposure and page-rank to their increasingly irrelevant views. Unless I miss the mark, I don't think they can be convinced of your position; it's their profession not to. Can I suggest you ignore them somewhat more? Or if you feel the need to respond to their links, that you link to cat pictures instead? You don’t gain anything from engaging in a dialog with professional Brady employees, except to give more exposure and page-rank to their increasingly irrelevant views. Unless I miss the mark, I don’t think they can be convinced of your position; it’s their profession not to.

Can I suggest you ignore them somewhat more? Or if you feel the need to respond to their links, that you link to cat pictures instead?

]]> By: Dann http://www.pagunblog.com/2010/02/07/another-response-from-the-brady-folks/#comment-57018 Dann Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:13:04 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=16484#comment-57018 Ahhh, Sebastian, you are experiencing the futility of have a battle of wits with an organization that is unarmed - so to speak. Kinda like bring a knife (or a pee-shooter) to a gun fight. Ahhh, Sebastian, you are experiencing the futility of have a battle of wits with an organization that is unarmed – so to speak.

Kinda like bring a knife (or a pee-shooter) to a gun fight.

]]> By: Joe Huffman http://www.pagunblog.com/2010/02/07/another-response-from-the-brady-folks/#comment-57014 Joe Huffman Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:26:59 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=16484#comment-57014 Matthew, See <a href="http://blog.joehuffman.org/2010/02/08/ACuturalIssue.aspx" rel="nofollow">the blog post I just made referring to that study</a>. Matthew,

See the blog post I just made referring to that study.

]]> By: Matthew Carberry http://www.pagunblog.com/2010/02/07/another-response-from-the-brady-folks/#comment-57013 Matthew Carberry Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:13:49 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=16484#comment-57013 Joe, Read Kleck's study you linked to (it pays to be a returning university student at 39 now and again). Strange to see that facts and reason (ex: noting lowering of crime rate during massively increased ownership and carry opportunities) will likely not have much effect on the hardest core anti-gunners. So much for "letting sound science and reason guide policy". =/ Joe,

Read Kleck’s study you linked to (it pays to be a returning university student at 39 now and again).

Strange to see that facts and reason (ex: noting lowering of crime rate during massively increased ownership and carry opportunities) will likely not have much effect on the hardest core anti-gunners. So much for “letting sound science and reason guide policy”. =/

]]> By: Thirdpower http://www.pagunblog.com/2010/02/07/another-response-from-the-brady-folks/#comment-57011 Thirdpower Sun, 07 Feb 2010 23:41:25 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=16484#comment-57011 To bad the Brady's won't allow comments on their 'blog' or come over here for debate. To bad the Brady’s won’t allow comments on their ‘blog’ or come over here for debate.

]]>