Comments on: What Tiger Woods Says About Lautenberg http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/12/02/what-tiger-woods-says-about-lautenberg/ The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ... Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:18:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: SayUncle » Tiger Woods and Lautenberg http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/12/02/what-tiger-woods-says-about-lautenberg/#comment-54098 SayUncle » Tiger Woods and Lautenberg Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:27:29 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14698#comment-54098 [...] And the grey areas of domestic violence. [...] [...] And the grey areas of domestic violence. [...]

]]> By: Ian Argent http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/12/02/what-tiger-woods-says-about-lautenberg/#comment-54055 Ian Argent Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:23:42 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14698#comment-54055 All the classes of people you list are at least potentially prohibited persons already. In NJ, alcoholics and drug addicts are (I haven't actually read the 4473 to see if they are federally prohibited), there's already the possibility for a veteran to be disabled under certain circumstances, etc. In fact, the VA Tech killer WAS a prohibited person, only no-one told the feds All the classes of people you list are at least potentially prohibited persons already. In NJ, alcoholics and drug addicts are (I haven’t actually read the 4473 to see if they are federally prohibited), there’s already the possibility for a veteran to be disabled under certain circumstances, etc. In fact, the VA Tech killer WAS a prohibited person, only no-one told the feds

]]> By: JamesLee http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/12/02/what-tiger-woods-says-about-lautenberg/#comment-54052 JamesLee Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:43:53 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14698#comment-54052 I remember saying at the time of VA Tech, that were I bent on getting rid of firearms, I would do it incrementally. First, those with mental problems, like the VA Tech shooter, because, hey, you know those folks are unstable. See what happened? Next, find some high-profile domestic dispute, and hey, you know, those emotions run way too high, we can't let those people have guns. See what happened? And how about those drunk drivers? Obviously, they spend their entire lives in a drunken stupor, so they must be added to the list of no-buy. Not to mention how unstable those veterans are that are returning from a war zone, anyone who's ever partaken of ANY sort of drugs, and so on and so on. Obviously, there ARE some folks who should not be in possession of firearms. Problem is, most of those will find one no matter what the laws are. I remember saying at the time of VA Tech, that were I bent on getting rid of firearms, I would do it incrementally. First, those with mental problems, like the VA Tech shooter, because, hey, you know those folks are unstable. See what happened?

Next, find some high-profile domestic dispute, and hey, you know, those emotions run way too high, we can’t let those people have guns. See what happened?

And how about those drunk drivers? Obviously, they spend their entire lives in a drunken stupor, so they must be added to the list of no-buy.

Not to mention how unstable those veterans are that are returning from a war zone, anyone who’s ever partaken of ANY sort of drugs, and so on and so on.

Obviously, there ARE some folks who should not be in possession of firearms. Problem is, most of those will find one no matter what the laws are.

]]>