Comments on: We bring facts and arguments … http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/11/we-bring-facts-and-arguments/ The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ... Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:54:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Yosemite Sam http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/11/we-bring-facts-and-arguments/#comment-52843 Yosemite Sam Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:37:37 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14218#comment-52843 "Is that flippant and dismissive?" Both, plus the last statement is flat out wrong as Major Hasan disproved that last week. I find it laughable how the gun-loons (anti-gunners are the real gun loons because it is always about guns with them) are trying to turn this incident into some kind of argument for gun control. 1.) Major Hasan was one of the types that gun controllers have always said should be allowed to have guns. He was serving in the military and was part of the government which according to the gun loony banners means that he was so much more skilled and knowledgeable in the ways of the gun than the unwashed masses. 2.) Even if civilian ownership of firearms was illegal or if Major Hasan was an officer in England, he would still have been allowed to acquire a firearms since he was scheduled to deploy to a hostile region and needed firearms training before deployment. Therefore in the gun banning loony’s fantasy gun controlled world, Major Hasan still would have had access to a firearm and still would have been able to kill his fellow soldiers. You people are pathetic. “Is that flippant and dismissive?”

Both, plus the last statement is flat out wrong as Major Hasan disproved that last week.

I find it laughable how the gun-loons (anti-gunners are the real gun loons because it is always about guns with them) are trying to turn this incident into some kind of argument for gun control.

1.) Major Hasan was one of the types that gun controllers have always said should be allowed to have guns. He was serving in the military and was part of the government which according to the gun loony banners means that he was so much more skilled and knowledgeable in the ways of the gun than the unwashed masses.

2.) Even if civilian ownership of firearms was illegal or if Major Hasan was an officer in England, he would still have been allowed to acquire a firearms since he was scheduled to deploy to a hostile region and needed firearms training before deployment.

Therefore in the gun banning loony’s fantasy gun controlled world, Major Hasan still would have had access to a firearm and still would have been able to kill his fellow soldiers. You people are pathetic.

]]> By: GunPundit » Blog Archive » ‘Staler than last year’s Christmas fruitcake’ http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/11/we-bring-facts-and-arguments/#comment-52841 GunPundit » Blog Archive » ‘Staler than last year’s Christmas fruitcake’ Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:49:53 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14218#comment-52841 [...] Via Sebastian: We bring facts and arguments…they bring dismissive insults and ignorance. Keep it up. [...] [...] Via Sebastian: We bring facts and arguments…they bring dismissive insults and ignorance. Keep it up. [...]

]]> By: mikeb302000 http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/11/we-bring-facts-and-arguments/#comment-52840 mikeb302000 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:59:08 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14218#comment-52840 Sometimes I think you guys see what you want to see. In response to the gun-free military bases, he said, <i>"My father was a career U.S. Army officer; I grew up on Army bases. The only way you can obtain a gun on a base is to sign one out at the armory, and only then for a good reason Ironically, U.S. military bases are often far safer than the cities outside them - because this part of the government, anyway, has stricter gun-control laws."</i> Is that flippant and dismissive? Sometimes I think you guys see what you want to see. In response to the gun-free military bases, he said, “My father was a career U.S. Army officer; I grew up on Army bases. The only way you can obtain a gun on a base is to sign one out at the armory, and only then for a good reason Ironically, U.S. military bases are often far safer than the cities outside them – because this part of the government, anyway, has stricter gun-control laws.”

Is that flippant and dismissive?

]]> By: Arnie http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/11/we-bring-facts-and-arguments/#comment-52831 Arnie Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:54:15 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14218#comment-52831 Wow! You were right, Sebastian. The anti-gunner evaded every question by giving a flippant remark or gratuitous aside. And I don't know what pro-gunner he debates with, but those were the most anemic softball responses I have ever seen. He had to have been made up. Give me ten minutes with that webhost and I'll have.him out buying his own handgun! Wow! You were right, Sebastian. The anti-gunner evaded every question by giving a flippant remark or gratuitous aside. And I don’t know what pro-gunner he debates with, but those were the most anemic softball responses I have ever seen. He had to have been made up. Give me ten minutes with that webhost and I’ll have.him out buying his own handgun!

]]> By: B Woodman http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/11/we-bring-facts-and-arguments/#comment-52827 B Woodman Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:44:53 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14218#comment-52827 Well, THAT was 30 seconds wasted reading that Huff&Puff posting. No sense in trying to rebut. Well, THAT was 30 seconds wasted reading that Huff&Puff posting. No sense in trying to rebut.

]]> By: jones http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/11/we-bring-facts-and-arguments/#comment-52822 jones Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:17:23 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14218#comment-52822 I'll be, the WCTU still has a "website." http://wctu.org/ There is always hope. I’ll be, the WCTU still has a “website.”

http://wctu.org/

There is always hope.

]]>