<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Ahead of Ourselves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/05/getting-ahead-of-ourselves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/05/getting-ahead-of-ourselves/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:30:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Argent</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/05/getting-ahead-of-ourselves/#comment-52657</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Argent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14076#comment-52657</guid>
		<description>Was surprising to me the first time I read it, considering the attitude of most DAs considering use of deadly force in the home in defense. The use of force outside the home is so tightly restricted as to be laughable,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was surprising to me the first time I read it, considering the attitude of most DAs considering use of deadly force in the home in defense. The use of force outside the home is so tightly restricted as to be laughable,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Carmel</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/05/getting-ahead-of-ourselves/#comment-52656</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Carmel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14076#comment-52656</guid>
		<description>Actually (surprizingly), self-defese within the home is permitted in NJ. See N.J.S.A. 2C:3-1 et.seq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually (surprizingly), self-defese within the home is permitted in NJ. See N.J.S.A. 2C:3-1 et.seq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elmo iscariot</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/05/getting-ahead-of-ourselves/#comment-52626</link>
		<dc:creator>elmo iscariot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14076#comment-52626</guid>
		<description>Dave Kopel put it perfectly:  Christie&#039;s election gives us NJ gun owners the prospect of benign neglect rather than active hostility.  Christie isn&#039;t crusading against us like Corzine was, but he isn&#039;t our friend either.  Expecting that NJ will join the 21st century and start issuing carry permits before Christie even takes office is Obama-level optimism.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Kopel put it perfectly:  Christie&#8217;s election gives us NJ gun owners the prospect of benign neglect rather than active hostility.  Christie isn&#8217;t crusading against us like Corzine was, but he isn&#8217;t our friend either.  Expecting that NJ will join the 21st century and start issuing carry permits before Christie even takes office is Obama-level optimism.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Argent</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/05/getting-ahead-of-ourselves/#comment-52622</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Argent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14076#comment-52622</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just going to say that action inside NJ won&#039;t result in shall-issue. And I expected that when I pushed the button for Christie.

That having been said - it will take 2 court victories (McDonald v Chicago and http://www.calgunsfoundation.org/index.php/news/71-saf-calguns-challenge-arbitrary-denial-of-right-to-bear-arms-in-california in CA) to force NJ to issue.

What I would like Christie to do is appoint some more strict-constructionist judges to the courts. No more of this &quot;can&#039;t believe the legislature meant that&quot; when that&#039;s what the law says in black-and-white.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just going to say that action inside NJ won&#8217;t result in shall-issue. And I expected that when I pushed the button for Christie.</p>
<p>That having been said &#8211; it will take 2 court victories (McDonald v Chicago and <a href="http://www.calgunsfoundation.org/index.php/news/71-saf-calguns-challenge-arbitrary-denial-of-right-to-bear-arms-in-california" rel="nofollow">http://www.calgunsfoundation.org/index.php/news/71-saf-calguns-challenge-arbitrary-denial-of-right-to-bear-arms-in-california</a> in CA) to force NJ to issue.</p>
<p>What I would like Christie to do is appoint some more strict-constructionist judges to the courts. No more of this &#8220;can&#8217;t believe the legislature meant that&#8221; when that&#8217;s what the law says in black-and-white.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeb302000</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/05/getting-ahead-of-ourselves/#comment-52615</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeb302000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14076#comment-52615</guid>
		<description>Christie himself said it to Hannity. It ain&#039;t gonna happen in N.J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christie himself said it to Hannity. It ain&#8217;t gonna happen in N.J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cemetery's Gun Blob</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/11/05/getting-ahead-of-ourselves/#comment-52614</link>
		<dc:creator>Cemetery's Gun Blob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=14076#comment-52614</guid>
		<description>The biggest obstacle we have in NJ, is the view that self defense, is not a *justifiable* reason to own a firearm.  That viewpoint is held with the Courts, the Legislature, the Police, and the majority of NJ residents.

The way laws are written in NJ, not only gun related laws, but there would have to be a total dismantling of the system, in order to make CCW legal, and even allow people to use a firearm for self defense, in, or out of the home.

Self defense is a big no no in NJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest obstacle we have in NJ, is the view that self defense, is not a *justifiable* reason to own a firearm.  That viewpoint is held with the Courts, the Legislature, the Police, and the majority of NJ residents.</p>
<p>The way laws are written in NJ, not only gun related laws, but there would have to be a total dismantling of the system, in order to make CCW legal, and even allow people to use a firearm for self defense, in, or out of the home.</p>
<p>Self defense is a big no no in NJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

