<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Trouble With OSHA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/08/17/the-trouble-with-osha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/08/17/the-trouble-with-osha/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:01:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ParatrooperJJ</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/08/17/the-trouble-with-osha/#comment-47999</link>
		<dc:creator>ParatrooperJJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=12325#comment-47999</guid>
		<description>OSHA already has some interesting rulings on firearms in the law enforcement area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OSHA already has some interesting rulings on firearms in the law enforcement area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gallo</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/08/17/the-trouble-with-osha/#comment-47819</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gallo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=12325#comment-47819</guid>
		<description>Technically, firearms should be allowed in XP areas as long as they are not disharged.  There&#039;s nothing inherently dangerous, the trouble would be getting a firearms manufacturer to actually pay for the validation process.

Your clothes are a bigger danger than a firearm around explosives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, firearms should be allowed in XP areas as long as they are not disharged.  There&#8217;s nothing inherently dangerous, the trouble would be getting a firearms manufacturer to actually pay for the validation process.</p>
<p>Your clothes are a bigger danger than a firearm around explosives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/08/17/the-trouble-with-osha/#comment-47813</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=12325#comment-47813</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re complaining that they teach instructors it&#039;s not a good idea to have loaded guns available during non-range dry fire practice?  Wow, that&#039;s a rather extreme view point.  I would feel sorry for our walls at the club where I used to teach.  Do you also object to keeping guns unloaded while cleaning?  That falls into the same category.

As for meetings, that would definitely be news to the dozens of bloggers who carried in Arizona and Kentucky.  The last no-carry meeting I can think of was Milwaukee.  I might add that the meeting was planned for Wisconsin at a time when concealed carry was passing.  Unfortunately, the veto overrides weren&#039;t successful.  By that time, it was too late to move a meeting of 60,000 people.  In Arizona, NRA actually got officials to change their licensing to allow carry in the convention hall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re complaining that they teach instructors it&#8217;s not a good idea to have loaded guns available during non-range dry fire practice?  Wow, that&#8217;s a rather extreme view point.  I would feel sorry for our walls at the club where I used to teach.  Do you also object to keeping guns unloaded while cleaning?  That falls into the same category.</p>
<p>As for meetings, that would definitely be news to the dozens of bloggers who carried in Arizona and Kentucky.  The last no-carry meeting I can think of was Milwaukee.  I might add that the meeting was planned for Wisconsin at a time when concealed carry was passing.  Unfortunately, the veto overrides weren&#8217;t successful.  By that time, it was too late to move a meeting of 60,000 people.  In Arizona, NRA actually got officials to change their licensing to allow carry in the convention hall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/08/17/the-trouble-with-osha/#comment-47809</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=12325#comment-47809</guid>
		<description>Sam Adams:  You have no idea what you&#039;re talking about.   It would be a shock to many people, including me, who carried at the NRA&#039;s last annual meeting, sometimes openly, that NRA does not allow it.  The only time they do not allow it is when state law does not allow it, or convention center rules do not allow it.  Any other time it&#039;s a go, and you can carry in their headquarters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam Adams:  You have no idea what you&#8217;re talking about.   It would be a shock to many people, including me, who carried at the NRA&#8217;s last annual meeting, sometimes openly, that NRA does not allow it.  The only time they do not allow it is when state law does not allow it, or convention center rules do not allow it.  Any other time it&#8217;s a go, and you can carry in their headquarters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/08/17/the-trouble-with-osha/#comment-47806</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=12325#comment-47806</guid>
		<description>Imagine the NRA CHOOSING to not allow firearms in some of their meetings.  They do it all the time.  According to my NRA instructor, they don&#039;t allow loaded firearms in the classroom.  They don&#039;t care about the Second Amendment, they only care about the money that can be had by the controversy around the Second Amendment.  The NRA does a good job at firearms training, but that is it.  You can bleat all you want but if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it is a duck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine the NRA CHOOSING to not allow firearms in some of their meetings.  They do it all the time.  According to my NRA instructor, they don&#8217;t allow loaded firearms in the classroom.  They don&#8217;t care about the Second Amendment, they only care about the money that can be had by the controversy around the Second Amendment.  The NRA does a good job at firearms training, but that is it.  You can bleat all you want but if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it is a duck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Michaels and gun control</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/08/17/the-trouble-with-osha/#comment-47802</link>
		<dc:creator>David Michaels and gun control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=12325#comment-47802</guid>
		<description>[...] gun restrictions and their place in OSHA&#8217;s agenda (&amp; welcome Instapundit, Point of Law, Snowflakes in Hell, CEI &#8220;Open Market&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gun restrictions and their place in OSHA&#8217;s agenda (&amp; welcome Instapundit, Point of Law, Snowflakes in Hell, CEI &#8220;Open Market&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

