<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RNC Ad on Sotomayor and the Second Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/07/17/rnc-ad-on-sotomayor-and-the-second-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/07/17/rnc-ad-on-sotomayor-and-the-second-amendment/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:52:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/07/17/rnc-ad-on-sotomayor-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-46297</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=11757#comment-46297</guid>
		<description>We would all respect her more for being intellectually honest.  However, we&#039;ve been so successful that if she is honest about her views, then she won&#039;t be confirmed.  It&#039;s both a good and bad position to be in.  The upside is that it means anyone who wants a future on the bench cannot be outspoken about any anti-gun views, especially not in their decisions.  On the other hand, there&#039;s an incentive for people looking to the top to lie until it&#039;s too late to do anything about them.  I&#039;m not sure how we win that battle without consistently winning elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We would all respect her more for being intellectually honest.  However, we&#8217;ve been so successful that if she is honest about her views, then she won&#8217;t be confirmed.  It&#8217;s both a good and bad position to be in.  The upside is that it means anyone who wants a future on the bench cannot be outspoken about any anti-gun views, especially not in their decisions.  On the other hand, there&#8217;s an incentive for people looking to the top to lie until it&#8217;s too late to do anything about them.  I&#8217;m not sure how we win that battle without consistently winning elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJSoldier</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/07/17/rnc-ad-on-sotomayor-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-46288</link>
		<dc:creator>NJSoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=11757#comment-46288</guid>
		<description>I would have a lot more respect for an honest &quot;No&quot; answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have a lot more respect for an honest &#8220;No&#8221; answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

