Eugene Volokh has a summary of the ruling from the 11th circuit. Eugene Volokh speaks of the entertainment value also, but a pipe bomb is a destructive device. You can have plenty of fun with things that go boom without making a destructive device. Just ask Joe. Of course, this is ignoring the “defense from tyrannical government” argument, which I think is important, but I think the government should have power to regulate explosive ordnance, or other items that have little use for self-defense, and pose an inherent risk to the community, no matter how responsible a person is.
18 Responses to “Pipe Bombs Not Protected by Second Amendment”
- SayUncle » Pipe bombs unprotected by second amendment - [...] Update: Looks like Sebastian has similar thoughts. [...]
- Snowflakes in Hell » Blog Archive » Explosives vs. Destructive Devices - [...] should note, based on some of the conversation going on in the previous post, that there’s a difference between ...