<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Craig&#8217;s List Killer&#8217;s Gun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/06/24/craigs-list-killers-gun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/06/24/craigs-list-killers-gun/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:53:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterT</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/06/24/craigs-list-killers-gun/#comment-45222</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=11255#comment-45222</guid>
		<description>Steve,

All that being the case then, they should be okay... One must assume, based on your statement that the perp provided the local residency evidence....

PeterT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>All that being the case then, they should be okay&#8230; One must assume, based on your statement that the perp provided the local residency evidence&#8230;.</p>
<p>PeterT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/06/24/craigs-list-killers-gun/#comment-45123</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=11255#comment-45123</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, this a-hole bought from from a reputable gun shop. I&#039;ve bought several pistols and rifles from this particular shop, it&#039;s a small family owned business, and the guys don&#039;t take shortcuts or let regulations slide. One of the employees is a former NH chief of police, I know that they know what they&#039;re doing when it comes to NICs checks etc.

It would be a loss to all of us in the local gunnie community if the BATFE drops the hammer on them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, this a-hole bought from from a reputable gun shop. I&#8217;ve bought several pistols and rifles from this particular shop, it&#8217;s a small family owned business, and the guys don&#8217;t take shortcuts or let regulations slide. One of the employees is a former NH chief of police, I know that they know what they&#8217;re doing when it comes to NICs checks etc.</p>
<p>It would be a loss to all of us in the local gunnie community if the BATFE drops the hammer on them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link P</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/06/24/craigs-list-killers-gun/#comment-45108</link>
		<dc:creator>Link P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=11255#comment-45108</guid>
		<description>The prohibition on of out of state handgun purchases is an infringement with no merit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prohibition on of out of state handgun purchases is an infringement with no merit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Gallo</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/06/24/craigs-list-killers-gun/#comment-45068</link>
		<dc:creator>M Gallo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=11255#comment-45068</guid>
		<description>What a silly question.  You simply need to remember that they think in terms of prior restraint.  To these idiots, consequences for lawbreakers are not enough; we need absolute, 100%, punctilious assurance that no one that has, will, or even can do something wrong ever gets a firearm.

So of course they will still argue it&#039;s not regulated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a silly question.  You simply need to remember that they think in terms of prior restraint.  To these idiots, consequences for lawbreakers are not enough; we need absolute, 100%, punctilious assurance that no one that has, will, or even can do something wrong ever gets a firearm.</p>
<p>So of course they will still argue it&#8217;s not regulated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

