<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frustrated Gun Control Activists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/24/frustrated-gun-control-activists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/24/frustrated-gun-control-activists/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton E. Cramer</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/24/frustrated-gun-control-activists/#comment-43417</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 23:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10641#comment-43417</guid>
		<description>I knew Lynne Woolsey before she was elected.  She may be the dumbest member of Congress-and yes, I know about Maxine Waters.  During the 1992 campaign, I was legislative officer for the Cotati Rod &amp; Gun Club.  I called up candidates during the primaries, finding out where they stood.  Even the Democrats who weren&#039;t pro-gun (and this being a district of millionaires, they were mostly anti-gun) at least made an attempt to find common ground, even if they were honest about their position.

Not Woolsey.  &quot;You know Clayton, I&#039;m not sure that there&#039;s even any point in our having this conversation.  If I had my way, private ownership of guns would be completely illegal.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew Lynne Woolsey before she was elected.  She may be the dumbest member of Congress-and yes, I know about Maxine Waters.  During the 1992 campaign, I was legislative officer for the Cotati Rod &amp; Gun Club.  I called up candidates during the primaries, finding out where they stood.  Even the Democrats who weren&#8217;t pro-gun (and this being a district of millionaires, they were mostly anti-gun) at least made an attempt to find common ground, even if they were honest about their position.</p>
<p>Not Woolsey.  &#8220;You know Clayton, I&#8217;m not sure that there&#8217;s even any point in our having this conversation.  If I had my way, private ownership of guns would be completely illegal.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/24/frustrated-gun-control-activists/#comment-43412</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 21:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10641#comment-43412</guid>
		<description>If the politics of the issue change, I think Obama will pick it up and fight for gun control.  If you look at his record, and the record of the people he&#039;s surrounded himself with, there can&#039;t be any doubt they&#039;d like to pass restrictions on guns.

But right now, the politics of the gun issue don&#039;t work for passing more gun control laws, because too many Democrats are in districts where they can&#039;t afford to vote for it.  Such was the case in 1994 too, so that&#039;s not a guarantee.

What we&#039;ve done is greatly raised the cost, politically, of gun control.  It&#039;s still possible, but it would require the Democrats sacrificing the rest of their agenda.  I don&#039;t think they are willing to do that currently.   But in 4 years if the Republicans can&#039;t make any headway?  Who knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the politics of the issue change, I think Obama will pick it up and fight for gun control.  If you look at his record, and the record of the people he&#8217;s surrounded himself with, there can&#8217;t be any doubt they&#8217;d like to pass restrictions on guns.</p>
<p>But right now, the politics of the gun issue don&#8217;t work for passing more gun control laws, because too many Democrats are in districts where they can&#8217;t afford to vote for it.  Such was the case in 1994 too, so that&#8217;s not a guarantee.</p>
<p>What we&#8217;ve done is greatly raised the cost, politically, of gun control.  It&#8217;s still possible, but it would require the Democrats sacrificing the rest of their agenda.  I don&#8217;t think they are willing to do that currently.   But in 4 years if the Republicans can&#8217;t make any headway?  Who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeb302000</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/24/frustrated-gun-control-activists/#comment-43394</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeb302000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10641#comment-43394</guid>
		<description>McCarthy also said , &quot;&quot;I do believe that down the road the president will start working on some of the gun violence issues.&quot; On my blog today I asked folks what they think about that.  

Could I ask you Sebastian?  Do you think Obama will turn on you guys like some of us had hoped?  Or, is the grassroots movement you keep talking about too much to combat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCarthy also said , &#8220;&#8221;I do believe that down the road the president will start working on some of the gun violence issues.&#8221; On my blog today I asked folks what they think about that.  </p>
<p>Could I ask you Sebastian?  Do you think Obama will turn on you guys like some of us had hoped?  Or, is the grassroots movement you keep talking about too much to combat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; Anti-gunners wonder why they lose, suck</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/24/frustrated-gun-control-activists/#comment-43390</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; Anti-gunners wonder why they lose, suck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 13:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10641#comment-43390</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sebastian, who notes the total dissing of the Brady Campaign. Speaking of, Paul Helmke is a sad panda: ”We need [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ATL</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/24/frustrated-gun-control-activists/#comment-43389</link>
		<dc:creator>ATL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10641#comment-43389</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; â€śYou just donâ€™t get it, Woolsey. You donâ€™t have our districts.â€ť

&lt;/i&gt;



This should be an eye-opener of what many of these 2006 mid-term Democrats from Republican districts think about their constituents. What happened to the days of a representative actually representing the interests of their districts? I agree about them finding out which side their toast is buttered on, but it goes far beyond that. This is an act, and one that will turn on us if they survive 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> â€śYou just donâ€™t get it, Woolsey. You donâ€™t have our districts.â€ť</p>
<p></i></p>
<p>This should be an eye-opener of what many of these 2006 mid-term Democrats from Republican districts think about their constituents. What happened to the days of a representative actually representing the interests of their districts? I agree about them finding out which side their toast is buttered on, but it goes far beyond that. This is an act, and one that will turn on us if they survive 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microbalrog</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/24/frustrated-gun-control-activists/#comment-43388</link>
		<dc:creator>Microbalrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10641#comment-43388</guid>
		<description>&gt;â€śWeâ€™ll probably end up passing more gun billsâ€ť that expand ownersâ€™ &gt;rights â€śthan we did during the Republican administration,â€ť 

Does Rep. McCarthy know something we don&#039;t? Are we to understand she&#039;s fighting against some gun-rights bill even as we type?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;â€śWeâ€™ll probably end up passing more gun billsâ€ť that expand ownersâ€™ &gt;rights â€śthan we did during the Republican administration,â€ť </p>
<p>Does Rep. McCarthy know something we don&#8217;t? Are we to understand she&#8217;s fighting against some gun-rights bill even as we type?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JIm Mullins</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/24/frustrated-gun-control-activists/#comment-43379</link>
		<dc:creator>JIm Mullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 02:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10641#comment-43379</guid>
		<description>Hope we didn&#039;d&#039; leat leagele</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope we didn&#8217;d&#8217; leat leagele</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/24/frustrated-gun-control-activists/#comment-43373</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 20:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10641#comment-43373</guid>
		<description>Holy crap. I was just about to send you the exact same link. It is funny. And I&#039;m kinda surprised that it was even brought up.

No mention of the brady&#039;s by name, no? Shows how much there known.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap. I was just about to send you the exact same link. It is funny. And I&#8217;m kinda surprised that it was even brought up.</p>
<p>No mention of the brady&#8217;s by name, no? Shows how much there known.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. W Woodward</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/24/frustrated-gun-control-activists/#comment-43371</link>
		<dc:creator>W. W Woodward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 19:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10641#comment-43371</guid>
		<description>â€śYou just donâ€™t get it, Woolsey. You donâ€™t have our districts.â€ť

Maybe, just maybe, the representatives (hired hands) making that statement have finally figured out which side of their toast has the butter on it.

Occasionally, we get the idea that our faxes, letters, and e-mails fall on deaf ears or, are short-stopped by staff and are never seen by our hired hands in Washington.

The quoted statement tells me that our hired hands are fearful of losing their cushy jobs if they don&#039;t pay at least some attention to their employers&#039; concerns.

We&#039;ve made some progress toward reestablishing the 2nd Amendment&#039;s proper meaning. Heller was a single battle in an ongoing war.  We still have many battles to fight.  We must not be ashamed to be a nuisance in the eyes of the people we hire and send to Washington.  After all, they are our employees, not our rulers.  Make them justify their jobs.  And, constantly remind them, If they can&#039;t or won&#039;t perform their jobs to our satisfaction, they can be replaced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€śYou just donâ€™t get it, Woolsey. You donâ€™t have our districts.â€ť</p>
<p>Maybe, just maybe, the representatives (hired hands) making that statement have finally figured out which side of their toast has the butter on it.</p>
<p>Occasionally, we get the idea that our faxes, letters, and e-mails fall on deaf ears or, are short-stopped by staff and are never seen by our hired hands in Washington.</p>
<p>The quoted statement tells me that our hired hands are fearful of losing their cushy jobs if they don&#8217;t pay at least some attention to their employers&#8217; concerns.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve made some progress toward reestablishing the 2nd Amendment&#8217;s proper meaning. Heller was a single battle in an ongoing war.  We still have many battles to fight.  We must not be ashamed to be a nuisance in the eyes of the people we hire and send to Washington.  After all, they are our employees, not our rulers.  Make them justify their jobs.  And, constantly remind them, If they can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t perform their jobs to our satisfaction, they can be replaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/24/frustrated-gun-control-activists/#comment-43370</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10641#comment-43370</guid>
		<description>I suspect that&#039;s why he made sure to say national organization.  Although that makes me wonder how well his wife plays with Paul Helmke and/or Josh Sugarmann.  This comment may reveal that they don&#039;t play so well together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that&#8217;s why he made sure to say national organization.  Although that makes me wonder how well his wife plays with Paul Helmke and/or Josh Sugarmann.  This comment may reveal that they don&#8217;t play so well together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

