<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruger SR-556</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:56:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fourquet</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556/#comment-43690</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fourquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 17:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10397#comment-43690</guid>
		<description>Can the Magpul CTR commercial stock be used on the new Ruger SR 556?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can the Magpul CTR commercial stock be used on the new Ruger SR 556?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556/#comment-42995</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 22:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10397#comment-42995</guid>
		<description>Okay, I gotta ask...

Why didn&#039;t they just put an adjustable gas system, a real gas piston, a chrome lined barrel, a flash hider, and STANAG Mag compatibility on the MINI-14? I might actually be inclined to buy one of those!

A piston AR? Not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I gotta ask&#8230;</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t they just put an adjustable gas system, a real gas piston, a chrome lined barrel, a flash hider, and STANAG Mag compatibility on the MINI-14? I might actually be inclined to buy one of those!</p>
<p>A piston AR? Not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man At Arms</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556/#comment-42993</link>
		<dc:creator>Man At Arms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 19:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10397#comment-42993</guid>
		<description>Ruger&#039;s MSRP is always at least 25% high. Think 1300-1600 for an excellent piston AR with high-end extras. These are going to do well.

@Caleb:

So, should we take it that you prefer manufacturers who ignore minute design flaws that only show up when 30,000 products are in the hands of early adopters?

Everybody gets on Ruger&#039;s ass about recalls. Most companies are slow to fix problems, and when they do, they leave early adopters SOL. Recalls are very expensive, and a sign of RESPONSIBILITY, not poor reliability.

MY LCP was back in my mailbox three days after I sent it. They also installed non-safety upgrades based on customer suggestions. They sent me an extra mag (and a goofy hat I sold for 20 bucks on ebay) and some other neat freebies.

Can somebody please explain to me what is so contemptible about recalls?

They even sell factory 30rd magazines to the public again. We spoke and they listened. Why punish them for it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruger&#8217;s MSRP is always at least 25% high. Think 1300-1600 for an excellent piston AR with high-end extras. These are going to do well.</p>
<p>@Caleb:</p>
<p>So, should we take it that you prefer manufacturers who ignore minute design flaws that only show up when 30,000 products are in the hands of early adopters?</p>
<p>Everybody gets on Ruger&#8217;s ass about recalls. Most companies are slow to fix problems, and when they do, they leave early adopters SOL. Recalls are very expensive, and a sign of RESPONSIBILITY, not poor reliability.</p>
<p>MY LCP was back in my mailbox three days after I sent it. They also installed non-safety upgrades based on customer suggestions. They sent me an extra mag (and a goofy hat I sold for 20 bucks on ebay) and some other neat freebies.</p>
<p>Can somebody please explain to me what is so contemptible about recalls?</p>
<p>They even sell factory 30rd magazines to the public again. We spoke and they listened. Why punish them for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: countertop</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556/#comment-42972</link>
		<dc:creator>countertop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 03:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10397#comment-42972</guid>
		<description>Justin

A SIG556 is exactly what I thought this was competing with when I first saw it. 

Which wouldn&#039;t be a bad thing at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin</p>
<p>A SIG556 is exactly what I thought this was competing with when I first saw it. </p>
<p>Which wouldn&#8217;t be a bad thing at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Buist</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556/#comment-42967</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Buist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 01:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10397#comment-42967</guid>
		<description>To me Ruger means rugged, reliable, and inexpensive.  That MSRP doesn&#039;t look inexpensive to me.  Heck, it&#039;s almost as high as a SIG556.

How about a version with a fixed stock, standard A2 pistol grip, and a less expensive, simpler, foreend?  That might help keep the MSRP somewhere around $1200 which is where I suspect you&#039;ll have to go to compete with the likes of Bushmaster and the rest of the gang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me Ruger means rugged, reliable, and inexpensive.  That MSRP doesn&#8217;t look inexpensive to me.  Heck, it&#8217;s almost as high as a SIG556.</p>
<p>How about a version with a fixed stock, standard A2 pistol grip, and a less expensive, simpler, foreend?  That might help keep the MSRP somewhere around $1200 which is where I suspect you&#8217;ll have to go to compete with the likes of Bushmaster and the rest of the gang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Foxtrot</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556/#comment-42966</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Foxtrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 01:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10397#comment-42966</guid>
		<description>Will Ruger sell SR-556 uppers?  It would really help those of us stuck behind the lines in California.  I hope I&#039;d be able to mate the Ruger upper to a legal off-list AR-15 receiver.  

Thanks!  And great blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Ruger sell SR-556 uppers?  It would really help those of us stuck behind the lines in California.  I hope I&#8217;d be able to mate the Ruger upper to a legal off-list AR-15 receiver.  </p>
<p>Thanks!  And great blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruger SR-556: AR-15 has arrived &#124; The Firearm Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556/#comment-42965</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruger SR-556: AR-15 has arrived &#124; The Firearm Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 00:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10397#comment-42965</guid>
		<description>[...] This photo is from Snowflakes in Hell. For the high resolution version and many more photos as well as on the ground reporting from the launch visit Snowflakes in Hell: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This photo is from Snowflakes in Hell. For the high resolution version and many more photos as well as on the ground reporting from the launch visit Snowflakes in Hell: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N.U.G.U.N.</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556/#comment-42962</link>
		<dc:creator>N.U.G.U.N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 00:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10397#comment-42962</guid>
		<description>I tried to get some answers to questions and I&#039;ve got a bunch of photos and video here..

http://nugun.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556-photos-and-video/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to get some answers to questions and I&#8217;ve got a bunch of photos and video here..</p>
<p><a href="http://nugun.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556-photos-and-video/" rel="nofollow">http://nugun.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556-photos-and-video/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZerCool</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556/#comment-42961</link>
		<dc:creator>ZerCool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 23:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10397#comment-42961</guid>
		<description>Will they have a ban-state-friendly version - fixed stock and no flash hider?

I still say 2k is wicked steep for an AR... even in today&#039;s insanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will they have a ban-state-friendly version &#8211; fixed stock and no flash hider?</p>
<p>I still say 2k is wicked steep for an AR&#8230; even in today&#8217;s insanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/15/ruger-sr-556/#comment-42956</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 22:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10397#comment-42956</guid>
		<description>Did Ruger design the piston system themselves or is it an existing system they licensed (like S&amp;W did)?

Thanks Sebastian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Ruger design the piston system themselves or is it an existing system they licensed (like S&amp;W did)?</p>
<p>Thanks Sebastian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

