<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A View of Things to Come?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/13/a-view-of-things-to-come/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/13/a-view-of-things-to-come/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:10:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Technical Difficulty - 047</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/13/a-view-of-things-to-come/#comment-42919</link>
		<dc:creator>Technical Difficulty - 047</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10351#comment-42919</guid>
		<description>[...] A View of Things to Come? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A View of Things to Come? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomcatshanger</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/13/a-view-of-things-to-come/#comment-42900</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomcatshanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10351#comment-42900</guid>
		<description>Ya know, that looks like an AR-10 bolt carrier.

So maybe it&#039;s not a M14, but I bet it&#039;s still in .308.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya know, that looks like an AR-10 bolt carrier.</p>
<p>So maybe it&#8217;s not a M14, but I bet it&#8217;s still in .308.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Saint Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/13/a-view-of-things-to-come/#comment-42881</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Saint Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10351#comment-42881</guid>
		<description>I have a dream that Ruger will co-oped the 1911 Magazine for their .45s...

Then come out with a PC45.  (ala the camp carbine.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a dream that Ruger will co-oped the 1911 Magazine for their .45s&#8230;</p>
<p>Then come out with a PC45.  (ala the camp carbine.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdb</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/13/a-view-of-things-to-come/#comment-42870</link>
		<dc:creator>pdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10351#comment-42870</guid>
		<description>Tam, it would be highly revolutionary if someone made a piston AR that ran better than a DI AR!

I would not put money on Ruger being that someone, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tam, it would be highly revolutionary if someone made a piston AR that ran better than a DI AR!</p>
<p>I would not put money on Ruger being that someone, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/13/a-view-of-things-to-come/#comment-42869</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10351#comment-42869</guid>
		<description>Wow, a piston AR. How revolutionary. Only not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a piston AR. How revolutionary. Only not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; Ruger Rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/13/a-view-of-things-to-come/#comment-42868</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; Ruger Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10351#comment-42868</guid>
		<description>[...] Sebastian managed to snag a pic of something that could be a clue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sebastian managed to snag a pic of something that could be a clue. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What from Ruger? &#171; Stuff From Hsoi</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/13/a-view-of-things-to-come/#comment-42867</link>
		<dc:creator>What from Ruger? &#171; Stuff From Hsoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 12:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10351#comment-42867</guid>
		<description>[...] Sebastian has a possible teaser? If it&#8217;s accurate, I&#8217;m good in my prediction. We&#8217;ll see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sebastian has a possible teaser? If it&#8217;s accurate, I&#8217;m good in my prediction. We&#8217;ll see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruger Rumor Roundup &#124; The Firearm Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/13/a-view-of-things-to-come/#comment-42865</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruger Rumor Roundup &#124; The Firearm Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 11:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10351#comment-42865</guid>
		<description>[...] found a photo showing a AR-15 bolt carrier with a Ruger logo. I have been harping on about a Ruger AR-15 for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found a photo showing a AR-15 bolt carrier with a Ruger logo. I have been harping on about a Ruger AR-15 for a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasFred</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/13/a-view-of-things-to-come/#comment-42860</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasFred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 03:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10351#comment-42860</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve owned 3 Ruger arms in my life, my very first .357 was a Security Six, a great pistol, had NO trouble with it at all... 

I had 2 Mini-14&#039;s years back, a stainless and a blue, both were pretty good shooters, but I haven&#039;t shot a Ruger in years.

Not being a fan of the AR, in ANY configuration, well, I guess I&#039;ll have to rely on you guys for the review here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve owned 3 Ruger arms in my life, my very first .357 was a Security Six, a great pistol, had NO trouble with it at all&#8230; </p>
<p>I had 2 Mini-14&#8242;s years back, a stainless and a blue, both were pretty good shooters, but I haven&#8217;t shot a Ruger in years.</p>
<p>Not being a fan of the AR, in ANY configuration, well, I guess I&#8217;ll have to rely on you guys for the review here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibertyNews</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/13/a-view-of-things-to-come/#comment-42857</link>
		<dc:creator>LibertyNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10351#comment-42857</guid>
		<description>A oprod system isn&#039;t new for the AR platform. There are several available.

I&#039;ve been generally unimpressed with my Ruger firearms. I don&#039;t think I&#039;d buy their version of an AR-15.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A oprod system isn&#8217;t new for the AR platform. There are several available.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been generally unimpressed with my Ruger firearms. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d buy their version of an AR-15.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

