Comments on: Good News in California http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/06/good-news-in-california/ The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ... Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:53:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ride Fast http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/06/good-news-in-california/#comment-42552 Ride Fast Thu, 07 May 2009 18:44:10 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10229#comment-42552 [...] California ammo restriction one step closer to being killed [...] I have to go to Virginia via Pennsylvania to find out what's going in California. Heh. [...] California ammo restriction one step closer to being killed [...]

I have to go to Virginia via Pennsylvania to find out what’s going in California. Heh.

]]> By: Flight-ER-Doc http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/06/good-news-in-california/#comment-42535 Flight-ER-Doc Thu, 07 May 2009 12:19:24 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10229#comment-42535 In California, the 'suspense file' allows the leadership to determine which bills will be brought to the floor for a vote. It doesn't mean it's dead. E.g: http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2008/08/governor_and_ca.html In California, the ‘suspense file’ allows the leadership to determine which bills will be brought to the floor for a vote. It doesn’t mean it’s dead.

E.g:

http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2008/08/governor_and_ca.html

]]> By: Carl in Chicago http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/05/06/good-news-in-california/#comment-42534 Carl in Chicago Thu, 07 May 2009 11:55:59 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=10229#comment-42534 That bill is ridiculous. Boy do we need some solid standard-of-review we can use as basis to launch argument against legislation like that. Least restrictive means, narrowly tailored to meet compelling governmental interest would do. It seems that in CA they like to throw everything at the wall to see what sticks. I think that the lawsuits against the CA "safe handguns" roster, as well as against their discretionary carry laws are scaring the Brady's even more. Will we one day see these groups go away? Will we see them pursue actual and workable violence reduction agendas? Will they lay in to pushing for internationally mediated gun control? Who knows ... but right now, they must be seriously rethinking their game plan. On that note ... Brady's signed an anti-gun amicus in Nordyke ... but they did not sign the one submitted in this Chicago handgun ban case. Telling? That bill is ridiculous. Boy do we need some solid standard-of-review we can use as basis to launch argument against legislation like that. Least restrictive means, narrowly tailored to meet compelling governmental interest would do. It seems that in CA they like to throw everything at the wall to see what sticks.

I think that the lawsuits against the CA “safe handguns” roster, as well as against their discretionary carry laws are scaring the Brady’s even more.

Will we one day see these groups go away? Will we see them pursue actual and workable violence reduction agendas? Will they lay in to pushing for internationally mediated gun control?

Who knows … but right now, they must be seriously rethinking their game plan.

On that note … Brady’s signed an anti-gun amicus in Nordyke … but they did not sign the one submitted in this Chicago handgun ban case. Telling?

]]>