<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Will NRA Do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/24/what-will-nra-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/24/what-will-nra-do/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/24/what-will-nra-do/#comment-42091</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9931#comment-42091</guid>
		<description>You can say that all you want.  At this point, you&#039;re not adding anything new.  It&#039;s not changing minds.  I&#039;m also not changing your mind.  (Though, in the interest of adding something new, the media is asking for comment, and he&#039;s refusing to say anything.)  So, I would suggest that unless something new breaks in favor of your side of the issue or mine, this back and forth should just end.  If I post about it again, feel free to express your opinion again. But really, it&#039;s just getting old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can say that all you want.  At this point, you&#8217;re not adding anything new.  It&#8217;s not changing minds.  I&#8217;m also not changing your mind.  (Though, in the interest of adding something new, the media is asking for comment, and he&#8217;s refusing to say anything.)  So, I would suggest that unless something new breaks in favor of your side of the issue or mine, this back and forth should just end.  If I post about it again, feel free to express your opinion again. But really, it&#8217;s just getting old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan M</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/24/what-will-nra-do/#comment-42089</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9931#comment-42089</guid>
		<description>Rush Limbaugh also gives money to PETA for the privilege of using &quot;My City Was Gone&quot; and also because he supported efforts to limit the use of animals in chemical testing.

I agree that he should stop publicly supporting HSUS and should politely distance himself from them.  I don&#039;t see any reason to stop listening to his program because of those PSAs, and I don&#039;t think anyone needs a public apology, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh also gives money to PETA for the privilege of using &#8220;My City Was Gone&#8221; and also because he supported efforts to limit the use of animals in chemical testing.</p>
<p>I agree that he should stop publicly supporting HSUS and should politely distance himself from them.  I don&#8217;t see any reason to stop listening to his program because of those PSAs, and I don&#8217;t think anyone needs a public apology, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/24/what-will-nra-do/#comment-42007</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9931#comment-42007</guid>
		<description>Rush may have adopted a pet from an animal shelter, but I find it hard to believe he got a pet from a political organization that has no connections to pet shelters.

In Rush&#039;s own state of Florida, lawmakers swept into action a few years ago when they learned that not a cent of money generated from specialty license plates sold to raise money for animal shelters was being given to those shelters.  Even HSUS admitted during the debates that money raised for them does not support local shelters where people adopt pets.  It&#039;s why they chose their name, so people would be confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush may have adopted a pet from an animal shelter, but I find it hard to believe he got a pet from a political organization that has no connections to pet shelters.</p>
<p>In Rush&#8217;s own state of Florida, lawmakers swept into action a few years ago when they learned that not a cent of money generated from specialty license plates sold to raise money for animal shelters was being given to those shelters.  Even HSUS admitted during the debates that money raised for them does not support local shelters where people adopt pets.  It&#8217;s why they chose their name, so people would be confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikee</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/24/what-will-nra-do/#comment-42005</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9931#comment-42005</guid>
		<description>Rush got a great pet through the humane society. He may be using his heart rather than his head here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush got a great pet through the humane society. He may be using his heart rather than his head here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan M</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/24/what-will-nra-do/#comment-41922</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9931#comment-41922</guid>
		<description>By &quot;you&quot; I was collectively referring to you and Sebastian.  Since you personally don&#039;t hold that stance, I apologize.

I have simply maintained that Rush recorded a PSA and not a fund-raising advertisement.  I would like for him to clarify on his program that he doesn&#039;t support giving money to organizations that are going to do things with that money that you don&#039;t like, I would like for him to reaffirm his stance supporting the welfare of pets and politely distance himself from the extreme positions of HSUS.  However, I think demanding an apology is silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By &#8220;you&#8221; I was collectively referring to you and Sebastian.  Since you personally don&#8217;t hold that stance, I apologize.</p>
<p>I have simply maintained that Rush recorded a PSA and not a fund-raising advertisement.  I would like for him to clarify on his program that he doesn&#8217;t support giving money to organizations that are going to do things with that money that you don&#8217;t like, I would like for him to reaffirm his stance supporting the welfare of pets and politely distance himself from the extreme positions of HSUS.  However, I think demanding an apology is silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/24/what-will-nra-do/#comment-41901</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9931#comment-41901</guid>
		<description>Actually, Dan, I&#039;ve argued before that NRA should consider knocking the grades of any Blue Dogs who did lie about Obama&#039;s record.  So if that&#039;s your example of my supposed hypocrisy, you&#039;ll have to dig deeper.

It doesn&#039;t matter if Rush personally opposes hunting or not - he&#039;s lending his endorsement to the organization that will use funds raised from that endorsement to ban hunting.  He is asking his listeners and others to support HSUS&#039;s work and that includes efforts to ban hunting.  He has endorsed their viewpoint, unless he clarifies and denounces their actions on the issue.  So far, he&#039;s continued to ignore hunters who have pointed this out completely rather than clarifying his views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Dan, I&#8217;ve argued before that NRA should consider knocking the grades of any Blue Dogs who did lie about Obama&#8217;s record.  So if that&#8217;s your example of my supposed hypocrisy, you&#8217;ll have to dig deeper.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter if Rush personally opposes hunting or not &#8211; he&#8217;s lending his endorsement to the organization that will use funds raised from that endorsement to ban hunting.  He is asking his listeners and others to support HSUS&#8217;s work and that includes efforts to ban hunting.  He has endorsed their viewpoint, unless he clarifies and denounces their actions on the issue.  So far, he&#8217;s continued to ignore hunters who have pointed this out completely rather than clarifying his views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan M</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/24/what-will-nra-do/#comment-41887</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9931#comment-41887</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t see the big deal about Rush Limbaugh and HSUS.  He did a PSA to talk about dog fighting.  Then he does jokes about exploding rodents.  So it&#039;s obvious that he doesn&#039;t oppose hunting.  I don&#039;t think every single person who endorsed Barack Obama or who gave money to the Democratic Party has to prostrate himself before the NRA and give public apologies, likewise not every person who simply records an anti-dog fighting PSA for HSUS doesn&#039;t need to publicly apologize.

If you are going to make excuses for the NRA for not holding accountable Democrats who swore that Barack Obama respected the 2nd Amendment, then I think it&#039;s pathetic for you to be so indignant that Rush Limbaugh would record a PSA against dog fighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t see the big deal about Rush Limbaugh and HSUS.  He did a PSA to talk about dog fighting.  Then he does jokes about exploding rodents.  So it&#8217;s obvious that he doesn&#8217;t oppose hunting.  I don&#8217;t think every single person who endorsed Barack Obama or who gave money to the Democratic Party has to prostrate himself before the NRA and give public apologies, likewise not every person who simply records an anti-dog fighting PSA for HSUS doesn&#8217;t need to publicly apologize.</p>
<p>If you are going to make excuses for the NRA for not holding accountable Democrats who swore that Barack Obama respected the 2nd Amendment, then I think it&#8217;s pathetic for you to be so indignant that Rush Limbaugh would record a PSA against dog fighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FatWhiteMan</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/24/what-will-nra-do/#comment-41884</link>
		<dc:creator>FatWhiteMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9931#comment-41884</guid>
		<description>How about the: &quot;Celebration Of American Values Except We Don&#039;t Mention The Gunshow Loophole While Endorsing a RINO Who Wanted To Close The Gunshow Loophole But Since He Didn&#039;t Win We Are Fighting The Gunshow Loophole Again Banquet.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the: &#8220;Celebration Of American Values Except We Don&#8217;t Mention The Gunshow Loophole While Endorsing a RINO Who Wanted To Close The Gunshow Loophole But Since He Didn&#8217;t Win We Are Fighting The Gunshow Loophole Again Banquet.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/24/what-will-nra-do/#comment-41866</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9931#comment-41866</guid>
		<description>If he&#039;s going to address NRA members and claim he supports them, he should apologize for supporting HSUS, an organization that actively works to ban hunting.  If he&#039;s going to stand by HSUS, then he shouldn&#039;t be invited to address NRA members if he&#039;s going to continue supporting efforts to undermine us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he&#8217;s going to address NRA members and claim he supports them, he should apologize for supporting HSUS, an organization that actively works to ban hunting.  If he&#8217;s going to stand by HSUS, then he shouldn&#8217;t be invited to address NRA members if he&#8217;s going to continue supporting efforts to undermine us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan M</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/24/what-will-nra-do/#comment-41864</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9931#comment-41864</guid>
		<description>So, was there anything that Rush said that he should publicly apologize for, or simply for being associated in any way with HSUS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, was there anything that Rush said that he should publicly apologize for, or simply for being associated in any way with HSUS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

