<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NRA Statement on Inter-American Arms Treaty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/16/nra-statement-on-inter-american-arms-treaty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/16/nra-statement-on-inter-american-arms-treaty/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:52:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Skullz</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/16/nra-statement-on-inter-american-arms-treaty/#comment-41507</link>
		<dc:creator>Skullz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9740#comment-41507</guid>
		<description>Maybe Specter won&#039;t bend us over this time; now that Toomey has thrown his hat in the ring.

I wouldn&#039;t count on it though, and even though the emails have been sent and the phone calls have been made (not like I actually got through), I still don&#039;t trust that SOB further than I can shoot him out my nose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Specter won&#8217;t bend us over this time; now that Toomey has thrown his hat in the ring.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t count on it though, and even though the emails have been sent and the phone calls have been made (not like I actually got through), I still don&#8217;t trust that SOB further than I can shoot him out my nose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/16/nra-statement-on-inter-american-arms-treaty/#comment-41499</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9740#comment-41499</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t there been a lot of shenangins lately over in the senate?  

Who gets to make the rules and procedural BS?

Another thing, isn&#039;t that 2/3 PRESENT?  Haven&#039;t we extended voting and done crap in the middle of the night to get garbage like this passed?  Don&#039;t put anything past them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t there been a lot of shenangins lately over in the senate?  </p>
<p>Who gets to make the rules and procedural BS?</p>
<p>Another thing, isn&#8217;t that 2/3 PRESENT?  Haven&#8217;t we extended voting and done crap in the middle of the night to get garbage like this passed?  Don&#8217;t put anything past them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickR</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/04/16/nra-statement-on-inter-american-arms-treaty/#comment-41491</link>
		<dc:creator>RickR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9740#comment-41491</guid>
		<description>I do believe it takes 67 votes for a treaty....(2/3rds vote it says)

Of course they may try for a simple majority, what with teh lunkheads in charge...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe it takes 67 votes for a treaty&#8230;.(2/3rds vote it says)</p>
<p>Of course they may try for a simple majority, what with teh lunkheads in charge&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

