Apr 4, 2009 Posted by Sebastian in Crime | 5 comments

Pittsburgh Shooter a Prohibited Person?

Says this article:

Perkovic also said that [Scumbag Killer Who I Won't Do the Honor of Naming] had received a dishonorable discharge from the Marines and that he has a history of domestic disputes.

If he was dishonorably discharged, it’s not lawful for him to have a gun.

Related posts (automatically generated):

1. More Details, and They Aren’t Good
2. More on the Dishonorable Discharge
3. Pittsburgh Cop Killer Not Prohibited

5 Responses to “Pittsburgh Shooter a Prohibited Person?”

1. R. Franz says:

   Apr 4, 2009 at 3:24 pm

   If that is true, there is the question of how [unnamed] received those arms. According to the Brady Bunch, Pennsylvania is one of their model states, which closed the so called “Gun Show Loophole” (gag) years ago.
2. Sebastian says:

   Apr 4, 2009 at 3:34 pm

   We closed it in the 30s. I’m wondering if it was a less than honorable discharge, but not dishonorable. The friend might not get the difference.
3. Caleb says:

   Apr 4, 2009 at 3:59 pm

   Even if (for the moment) he wasn’t given a dishonorable punt, it seems like he’d had a history of domestic violence, which gives good odds that he was a prohibited person anyway.

   So, for funzies assume he was dishonorably discharged, and convicted of domestic abuse – it was DOUBLE ILLEGAL for him to have a gun. Man, it sure is a good thing those laws were in place, or something terrible might have happened.

   I can’t control my snark any longer.
4. TexasFred says:

   Apr 4, 2009 at 4:11 pm

   sadly, gun laws only affect the honest, those with a reason to avoid the lawful way, always will… And this clown is a prime example…
5. Mad Saint Jack says:

   Apr 4, 2009 at 6:13 pm

   Where in the world is Jeannie Assam?

   She should be held on high as an example for all to see.