<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private Transfer Ban Fails in Illinois</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/03/26/private-transfer-ban-fails-in-illinois/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/03/26/private-transfer-ban-fails-in-illinois/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:18:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Gwinn</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/03/26/private-transfer-ban-fails-in-illinois/#comment-40397</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Gwinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9157#comment-40397</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about the costs, but it&#039;s also a Catch-22 for their side.  Last year, the argument was that this measure was an unfair tax on gun owners.
This year they limited the transfer fee to $10 per transaction . . . and it turned out that dealers weren&#039;t charging $25-50 per transaction just because they could; they&#039;d be losing money at $10 per.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about the costs, but it&#8217;s also a Catch-22 for their side.  Last year, the argument was that this measure was an unfair tax on gun owners.<br />
This year they limited the transfer fee to $10 per transaction . . . and it turned out that dealers weren&#8217;t charging $25-50 per transaction just because they could; they&#8217;d be losing money at $10 per.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melancton Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/03/26/private-transfer-ban-fails-in-illinois/#comment-40393</link>
		<dc:creator>Melancton Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=9157#comment-40393</guid>
		<description>The IL bill capped the fee at $10, no doubt a money loser for dealers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IL bill capped the fee at $10, no doubt a money loser for dealers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

