<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clarification on Gillibrand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/02/11/clarification-on-gillibrand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/02/11/clarification-on-gillibrand/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowflakes in Hell &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Influence Hierarchy</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/02/11/clarification-on-gillibrand/#comment-38316</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowflakes in Hell &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Influence Hierarchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=8279#comment-38316</guid>
		<description>[...] was kind enough to give us a rank ordered list of types of people important to politicians: Based on my considerable experience in this area, here’s how - generally speaking - a candidate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was kind enough to give us a rank ordered list of types of people important to politicians: Based on my considerable experience in this area, here’s how &#8211; generally speaking &#8211; a candidate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: countertop</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/02/11/clarification-on-gillibrand/#comment-38284</link>
		<dc:creator>countertop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=8279#comment-38284</guid>
		<description>Remember, the first rule of politics is to win.  The issues themselves are meaningless.

Based on my considerable experience in this area, here&#039;s how - generally speaking - a candidate will prioritize the interests of stakeholders - all in the name of winning elections and diminishing the effort they need to undertake to win.

1) Ability to organize and deliver large numbers of constituents
2) Ability to organize large numbers of campaign volunteers
3) Ability to raise money from large numbers of donors
4) constituent who donated money and worked on campaign
5) constituent who donated money
6) constituent who worked on campaign
7) non constituent who worked on campaign
8) non constituent who donated money
9) constituent who is known to member and is a member of same party
10) constituent who is member of same party 
11) constituent who actually votes (and voted for member)
12) constituent who actually votes
13) constituent

As you can see, a little effort and organization on our side can have a huge impact on Gillibrand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, the first rule of politics is to win.  The issues themselves are meaningless.</p>
<p>Based on my considerable experience in this area, here&#8217;s how &#8211; generally speaking &#8211; a candidate will prioritize the interests of stakeholders &#8211; all in the name of winning elections and diminishing the effort they need to undertake to win.</p>
<p>1) Ability to organize and deliver large numbers of constituents<br />
2) Ability to organize large numbers of campaign volunteers<br />
3) Ability to raise money from large numbers of donors<br />
4) constituent who donated money and worked on campaign<br />
5) constituent who donated money<br />
6) constituent who worked on campaign<br />
7) non constituent who worked on campaign<br />
8) non constituent who donated money<br />
9) constituent who is known to member and is a member of same party<br />
10) constituent who is member of same party<br />
11) constituent who actually votes (and voted for member)<br />
12) constituent who actually votes<br />
13) constituent</p>
<p>As you can see, a little effort and organization on our side can have a huge impact on Gillibrand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

