http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/01/06/san-francisco-preparing-to-settle-with-nra/ The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ... Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:52:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/01/06/san-francisco-preparing-to-settle-with-nra/#comment-36148 JJR Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:11:25 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7529#comment-36148 Which is why the cases in Chicago, etc, are so important. Once one of them topples via the incorporation issue, they're all going to fall. Which is why the cases in Chicago, etc, are so important. Once one of them topples via the incorporation issue, they’re all going to fall.

]]> http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/01/06/san-francisco-preparing-to-settle-with-nra/#comment-36119 Sebastian Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:28:17 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7529#comment-36119 We sort of do, if you follow Supreme Court incorporation precedent, but until the Supreme Court says it's incorporated, it probably won't be in most federal circuits that have existing precedent that says the Second Amendment only applies to the federal government. We sort of do, if you follow Supreme Court incorporation precedent, but until the Supreme Court says it’s incorporated, it probably won’t be in most federal circuits that have existing precedent that says the Second Amendment only applies to the federal government.

]]> http://www.pagunblog.com/2009/01/06/san-francisco-preparing-to-settle-with-nra/#comment-36117 Crotalus Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:24:20 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7529#comment-36117 Don't we already have incorporation via the 14A? If we do, then the states are ignoring the inconvenient parts of it, such as the 2A, and they will continue to ignore other incorporation laws, won't they? Don’t we already have incorporation via the 14A? If we do, then the states are ignoring the inconvenient parts of it, such as the 2A, and they will continue to ignore other incorporation laws, won’t they?

]]>