<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Encourages Law Breaking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/12/18/pittsburgh-post-gazette-encourages-law-breaking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/12/18/pittsburgh-post-gazette-encourages-law-breaking/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:52:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: EgregiousCharles</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/12/18/pittsburgh-post-gazette-encourages-law-breaking/#comment-35582</link>
		<dc:creator>EgregiousCharles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 04:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7220#comment-35582</guid>
		<description>Jake, the way a veto is enacted in the case of this or a Presidential veto is by the executive (the Mayor or President) refusing to sign the legislation; the executive signature is normally required to pass a bill into law or ordinance.  Refusing to sign IS the veto.

In this Pittsburgh case the bill was passed with a veto-proof majority, meaning it does not require a signature to become an enforceable ordinance.  However, the Pittsburgh city council like the Philadelphia one has no power to pass such ordinances (being specifically restrained from doing so by state law) so it&#039;s all basically moot posing.

Unless they find some asinine wannabe jack booted thug, stick a badge on him, and get him to violate his oath by attempting to enforce this mere opinion in defiance or ignorance of the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake, the way a veto is enacted in the case of this or a Presidential veto is by the executive (the Mayor or President) refusing to sign the legislation; the executive signature is normally required to pass a bill into law or ordinance.  Refusing to sign IS the veto.</p>
<p>In this Pittsburgh case the bill was passed with a veto-proof majority, meaning it does not require a signature to become an enforceable ordinance.  However, the Pittsburgh city council like the Philadelphia one has no power to pass such ordinances (being specifically restrained from doing so by state law) so it&#8217;s all basically moot posing.</p>
<p>Unless they find some asinine wannabe jack booted thug, stick a badge on him, and get him to violate his oath by attempting to enforce this mere opinion in defiance or ignorance of the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike w.</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/12/18/pittsburgh-post-gazette-encourages-law-breaking/#comment-35563</link>
		<dc:creator>mike w.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7220#comment-35563</guid>
		<description>hmmm, so they encourage breaking the law in order to pass a law that they expect criminals to abide by?

Yeah, no flawed logic there....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm, so they encourage breaking the law in order to pass a law that they expect criminals to abide by?</p>
<p>Yeah, no flawed logic there&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; Law-abiding</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/12/18/pittsburgh-post-gazette-encourages-law-breaking/#comment-35525</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; Law-abiding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7220#comment-35525</guid>
		<description>[...] A Pittsburgh paper encourages law-breaking. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Pittsburgh paper encourages law-breaking. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/12/18/pittsburgh-post-gazette-encourages-law-breaking/#comment-35500</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7220#comment-35500</guid>
		<description>Real leadership would have been for him to veto the law (if he can) because it&#039;s illegal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real leadership would have been for him to veto the law (if he can) because it&#8217;s illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

