<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remaking Star Trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/11/20/remaking-star-trek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/11/20/remaking-star-trek/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:01:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: kreg</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/11/20/remaking-star-trek/#comment-34122</link>
		<dc:creator>kreg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6742#comment-34122</guid>
		<description>I think Simon Pegg as Scotty is going to be worth the price of the ticket, Sylar as Spock and Karl Urban as Bones only sweeten the deal. 

I like Star Trek, don&#039;t love but like it, so I&#039;m less liable to worry about time lines getting shuffled and whatnot, but the casting has actually piqued my interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Simon Pegg as Scotty is going to be worth the price of the ticket, Sylar as Spock and Karl Urban as Bones only sweeten the deal. </p>
<p>I like Star Trek, don&#8217;t love but like it, so I&#8217;m less liable to worry about time lines getting shuffled and whatnot, but the casting has actually piqued my interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allura</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/11/20/remaking-star-trek/#comment-34085</link>
		<dc:creator>Allura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6742#comment-34085</guid>
		<description>Thankfully, I&#039;m *gasp* NOT a Trek fan, so I&#039;m thinking I might go see this movie. The last few have seemed way too tied to a timeline that I&#039;m simply no longer familiar with (I stopped watching somewhere in TNG). The trailer was in front of Quantum of Solace, though, and looked interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankfully, I&#8217;m *gasp* NOT a Trek fan, so I&#8217;m thinking I might go see this movie. The last few have seemed way too tied to a timeline that I&#8217;m simply no longer familiar with (I stopped watching somewhere in TNG). The trailer was in front of Quantum of Solace, though, and looked interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyatt Earp</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/11/20/remaking-star-trek/#comment-34043</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyatt Earp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6742#comment-34043</guid>
		<description>I agree with Brad.

KHHHAAANNN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Brad.</p>
<p>KHHHAAANNN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJR</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/11/20/remaking-star-trek/#comment-34028</link>
		<dc:creator>JJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6742#comment-34028</guid>
		<description>Movies using the TOS cast, from best to worst:  II, VI, tie for 3rd with IV and III, I (The Motion Picture), and V (The movie that should never have been made and most Trekkers prefer to forget).

I am looking forward to the new film with the young Kirk, Spock, et. al.  It&#039;s hard to do &quot;retro&quot; tech right.  The Star Wars prequels had the same problem; they went with a Victorian steampunky Aesthetic with mixed results.  I have to confess, I initially HATED the series Enterprise, but I&#039;ve grown to like it over time, giving it a 2nd chance.

Voyager I eventually lost interest in and stopped watching.  DS9 was probably the coolest TV series in the entire Trek canon.  Of course, I watched TNG and its movies; The first few episodes of TNG sucked, but it got better with time.  The movies were...okay I guess, but just lacked the same gravitas as those with the TOS cast.  DS9 should&#039;ve gotten its own shot at a movie franchise.  Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Movies using the TOS cast, from best to worst:  II, VI, tie for 3rd with IV and III, I (The Motion Picture), and V (The movie that should never have been made and most Trekkers prefer to forget).</p>
<p>I am looking forward to the new film with the young Kirk, Spock, et. al.  It&#8217;s hard to do &#8220;retro&#8221; tech right.  The Star Wars prequels had the same problem; they went with a Victorian steampunky Aesthetic with mixed results.  I have to confess, I initially HATED the series Enterprise, but I&#8217;ve grown to like it over time, giving it a 2nd chance.</p>
<p>Voyager I eventually lost interest in and stopped watching.  DS9 was probably the coolest TV series in the entire Trek canon.  Of course, I watched TNG and its movies; The first few episodes of TNG sucked, but it got better with time.  The movies were&#8230;okay I guess, but just lacked the same gravitas as those with the TOS cast.  DS9 should&#8217;ve gotten its own shot at a movie franchise.  Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/11/20/remaking-star-trek/#comment-34005</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6742#comment-34005</guid>
		<description>KAAAHHHHHHN!
Star Trek 2 was my first exposure to Star Trek, and is one of my favorite movies of all time.

I&#039;ve always found that the shows are much better than any of the films.  Star Trek 2 aside, &quot;Amok Time&quot;, &quot;The City on the Edge of Forever&quot;, &quot;The Naked Time&quot; and the Next Generation Sequel &quot;The Naked Now&quot; are all far better than any of the movies, and I&#039;ve only touched on a few episodes.  There are many more that are worth of being &quot;better than a movie&quot;.  

I&#039;d rather they reboot the show a&#039;la Battlestar Galactica and not get bogged down in any continuity issues than try to make a movie that may not fit into the entire Star Trek canon.  The only thing that has peaked my interest is that J. J. Abrams is involved, so I fully expect the movie to be both smart and action-packed.

Also, Simon Pegg as Scotty is a great casting call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KAAAHHHHHHN!<br />
Star Trek 2 was my first exposure to Star Trek, and is one of my favorite movies of all time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always found that the shows are much better than any of the films.  Star Trek 2 aside, &#8220;Amok Time&#8221;, &#8220;The City on the Edge of Forever&#8221;, &#8220;The Naked Time&#8221; and the Next Generation Sequel &#8220;The Naked Now&#8221; are all far better than any of the movies, and I&#8217;ve only touched on a few episodes.  There are many more that are worth of being &#8220;better than a movie&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather they reboot the show a&#8217;la Battlestar Galactica and not get bogged down in any continuity issues than try to make a movie that may not fit into the entire Star Trek canon.  The only thing that has peaked my interest is that J. J. Abrams is involved, so I fully expect the movie to be both smart and action-packed.</p>
<p>Also, Simon Pegg as Scotty is a great casting call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/11/20/remaking-star-trek/#comment-33995</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6742#comment-33995</guid>
		<description>Oh man I am so scared of this movie.  I am a huge Star Trek nerd, and I have to say that on the one hand, I&#039;m glad the franchise is being rescued from Rick Berman, at the same time there were parts of the trailer that made me wince.

Trek really hasn&#039;t been &quot;good&quot; since Deep Space 9 ended, although there were episodes of &quot;Enterprise&quot; that were enjoyable.

Oh, and people who say that the only good Star Trek movie was II obviously missed &quot;First Contact&quot; (or 8 if you&#039;re going by numbers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man I am so scared of this movie.  I am a huge Star Trek nerd, and I have to say that on the one hand, I&#8217;m glad the franchise is being rescued from Rick Berman, at the same time there were parts of the trailer that made me wince.</p>
<p>Trek really hasn&#8217;t been &#8220;good&#8221; since Deep Space 9 ended, although there were episodes of &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; that were enjoyable.</p>
<p>Oh, and people who say that the only good Star Trek movie was II obviously missed &#8220;First Contact&#8221; (or 8 if you&#8217;re going by numbers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alcibiades</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/11/20/remaking-star-trek/#comment-33987</link>
		<dc:creator>Alcibiades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6742#comment-33987</guid>
		<description>Star Trek: Generations deserves a bit of scorn because they reused the Bird-of-Prey-explosion from Star Trek VI.

Stock footage sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Trek: Generations deserves a bit of scorn because they reused the Bird-of-Prey-explosion from Star Trek VI.</p>
<p>Stock footage sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Dock</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/11/20/remaking-star-trek/#comment-33982</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Dock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6742#comment-33982</guid>
		<description>I am fairly afraid of &quot;Star Trek 90210&quot; playing out before my eyes... however it will have to be better than, oh, &quot;Generations...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am fairly afraid of &#8220;Star Trek 90210&#8243; playing out before my eyes&#8230; however it will have to be better than, oh, &#8220;Generations&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CounterClckWise</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/11/20/remaking-star-trek/#comment-33981</link>
		<dc:creator>CounterClckWise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6742#comment-33981</guid>
		<description>Yes! Yes! YES! Trek is dreck.
But, revenge is a dish best served cold...and it&#039;s very cold in space.
There can be no peace as long as Kirk lives!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! Yes! YES! Trek is dreck.<br />
But, revenge is a dish best served cold&#8230;and it&#8217;s very cold in space.<br />
There can be no peace as long as Kirk lives!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linoge</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/11/20/remaking-star-trek/#comment-33970</link>
		<dc:creator>Linoge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6742#comment-33970</guid>
		<description>I have come to the conclusion that this is probably going to be a fairly decent science fiction movie.  I have yet to be convinced that it is going to be good &lt;em&gt;Trek&lt;/em&gt;.  

Already, I can tell they made the same error that horrific &quot;Enterprise&quot; television show did - the ship and technology look more advanced, more shiny, more high-speed-low-drag than TOS, which hardly works, considering the proposed timeline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have come to the conclusion that this is probably going to be a fairly decent science fiction movie.  I have yet to be convinced that it is going to be good <em>Trek</em>.  </p>
<p>Already, I can tell they made the same error that horrific &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; television show did &#8211; the ship and technology look more advanced, more shiny, more high-speed-low-drag than TOS, which hardly works, considering the proposed timeline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

