<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama on Concealed Carry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/31/obama-on-concealed-carry-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/31/obama-on-concealed-carry-2/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:54:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bullet</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/31/obama-on-concealed-carry-2/#comment-33878</link>
		<dc:creator>Bullet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6261#comment-33878</guid>
		<description>This is one reason I dont like Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one reason I dont like Obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/31/obama-on-concealed-carry-2/#comment-32647</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 02:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6261#comment-32647</guid>
		<description>BearArms:

I&#039;m not quite understanding this.  If Congress passes a ban on passing a certain type of law, all they have to do is make another that repeals the ban.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BearArms:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite understanding this.  If Congress passes a ban on passing a certain type of law, all they have to do is make another that repeals the ban.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BearArms</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/31/obama-on-concealed-carry-2/#comment-32637</link>
		<dc:creator>BearArms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6261#comment-32637</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t absurd, it is a necessity.  A federal ban on CCW laws would insure no gun grabbing congressperson could ever again introduce a bill banning CC weapons.  It would assure the State laws stand until the State decides to change them.  I am sorry you think it means he wants to ban states from passing CC laws, it doesn&#039;t.  He has always insisted this isn&#039;t something the courts, congress, or president should ever legislate. 

If you listen to the entire interview and not just a 10 second clip, earlier he said and I quote: 

&quot;Sportsman and hunters should be able to continue to use their weapons in a law abiding safe way. Individuals in jurisdictions where they are permitted should be able to have handguns to protect their families&quot;.

So how the hell can he be for them one minute and against them the next.  He may be dangerous but he isn&#039;t stupid.  People are simply misinterpreting what he said later in the interview and have twisted it to back up their hate and fear I reckon.

Now assault weapons are a totally different story as far as Obama is concerned ...  he wants those banned across the board and doesn&#039;t try to hide it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t absurd, it is a necessity.  A federal ban on CCW laws would insure no gun grabbing congressperson could ever again introduce a bill banning CC weapons.  It would assure the State laws stand until the State decides to change them.  I am sorry you think it means he wants to ban states from passing CC laws, it doesn&#8217;t.  He has always insisted this isn&#8217;t something the courts, congress, or president should ever legislate. </p>
<p>If you listen to the entire interview and not just a 10 second clip, earlier he said and I quote: </p>
<p>&#8220;Sportsman and hunters should be able to continue to use their weapons in a law abiding safe way. Individuals in jurisdictions where they are permitted should be able to have handguns to protect their families&#8221;.</p>
<p>So how the hell can he be for them one minute and against them the next.  He may be dangerous but he isn&#8217;t stupid.  People are simply misinterpreting what he said later in the interview and have twisted it to back up their hate and fear I reckon.</p>
<p>Now assault weapons are a totally different story as far as Obama is concerned &#8230;  he wants those banned across the board and doesn&#8217;t try to hide it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/31/obama-on-concealed-carry-2/#comment-32545</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6261#comment-32545</guid>
		<description>BearArms:

He was running as a candidate for federal office, saying he supports a ban on concealed carry laws.  How as Congress, do you ban yourself from making laws?  That&#039;s absurd.  If you support states controlling CCW, then you simply fail to support a bill mandating it. How could that be construed as anything other than a federal ban on states from passing concealed carry laws?  Especially given NPR&#039;s introduction to the topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BearArms:</p>
<p>He was running as a candidate for federal office, saying he supports a ban on concealed carry laws.  How as Congress, do you ban yourself from making laws?  That&#8217;s absurd.  If you support states controlling CCW, then you simply fail to support a bill mandating it. How could that be construed as anything other than a federal ban on states from passing concealed carry laws?  Especially given NPR&#8217;s introduction to the topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BearArms</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/31/obama-on-concealed-carry-2/#comment-32538</link>
		<dc:creator>BearArms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 20:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6261#comment-32538</guid>
		<description>Sebastian,

Please listen to the audio again.  He doesn&#039;t say he supports banning concealed carry of a firearm federally.  How is it possible you heard that?  Just like the NRA, Obama supports a federal ban on conceal carry laws.  Laws, not guns.  If you don&#039;t understand what that means, it is understandable.  It means there should be a federal ban on any laws regarding CCW.  Why do you think the NRA isn&#039;t going crazy over what people think they are hearing him say?  Because they 100% support banning federal CCW laws, too.  It is up to each state to decide CCW laws.  Not the Senate, the House, or the SC, and certainly not any sitting POTUS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sebastian,</p>
<p>Please listen to the audio again.  He doesn&#8217;t say he supports banning concealed carry of a firearm federally.  How is it possible you heard that?  Just like the NRA, Obama supports a federal ban on conceal carry laws.  Laws, not guns.  If you don&#8217;t understand what that means, it is understandable.  It means there should be a federal ban on any laws regarding CCW.  Why do you think the NRA isn&#8217;t going crazy over what people think they are hearing him say?  Because they 100% support banning federal CCW laws, too.  It is up to each state to decide CCW laws.  Not the Senate, the House, or the SC, and certainly not any sitting POTUS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This is my gun</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/31/obama-on-concealed-carry-2/#comment-32506</link>
		<dc:creator>This is my gun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 08:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6261#comment-32506</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obama on Concealed Carry...&lt;/strong&gt;

Once again, more proof has surfaced that Obama is lying through his teeth when he says he supports the 2nd Amendment.  Steven at Bucks Right has...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama on Concealed Carry&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Once again, more proof has surfaced that Obama is lying through his teeth when he says he supports the 2nd Amendment.  Steven at Bucks Right has&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raspberrysurprise</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/31/obama-on-concealed-carry-2/#comment-32456</link>
		<dc:creator>Raspberrysurprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 17:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6261#comment-32456</guid>
		<description>&quot;What are states rights? States don’t have rights, they have powers. Only people have rights.&quot;

Yes you are correct it&#039;s just that, as Dock said, the phrase is stuck in my head. Guess I had better get to fixin that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What are states rights? States don’t have rights, they have powers. Only people have rights.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes you are correct it&#8217;s just that, as Dock said, the phrase is stuck in my head. Guess I had better get to fixin that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibertyNews.org - Liberty and Freedom for All &#187; Obama For CCW Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/31/obama-on-concealed-carry-2/#comment-32444</link>
		<dc:creator>LibertyNews.org - Liberty and Freedom for All &#187; Obama For CCW Ban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6261#comment-32444</guid>
		<description>[...] Sebastian at snowflakesinhell and Steven at Bucks Right have also posted about this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sebastian at snowflakesinhell and Steven at Bucks Right have also posted about this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dock</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/31/obama-on-concealed-carry-2/#comment-32351</link>
		<dc:creator>Dock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6261#comment-32351</guid>
		<description>Fair enough... &quot;states&#039; rights&quot; is a phrase welded into my brain. I need to put a cerebral grinder to that phrase. 

Excellent point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough&#8230; &#8220;states&#8217; rights&#8221; is a phrase welded into my brain. I need to put a cerebral grinder to that phrase. </p>
<p>Excellent point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/31/obama-on-concealed-carry-2/#comment-32337</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=6261#comment-32337</guid>
		<description>What are states rights?  States don&#039;t have rights, they have powers.  Only people have rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are states rights?  States don&#8217;t have rights, they have powers.  Only people have rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

