<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Op-Eds on VCDL And Open Carry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/13/two-op-eds-on-vcdl-and-open-carry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/13/two-op-eds-on-vcdl-and-open-carry/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Hafemeister</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/13/two-op-eds-on-vcdl-and-open-carry/#comment-31457</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Hafemeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=5860#comment-31457</guid>
		<description>I always love it when they use the &quot;fire in a crowded theatre&quot; thing. See my comment below.

If we apply your firearms theory to free speech, one would have to restrain or disable their mouth when entering a crowded theatre. After all, anybody with a mouth could shout &quot;FIRE!&quot; Perhaps, only those with good reason to speak could get a license from the government to speak. With this license the government could ensure that people don&#039;t speak in sensitive places like schools, courthouses, and bars. Hey, does the pilot have a license to run a newspaper?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always love it when they use the &#8220;fire in a crowded theatre&#8221; thing. See my comment below.</p>
<p>If we apply your firearms theory to free speech, one would have to restrain or disable their mouth when entering a crowded theatre. After all, anybody with a mouth could shout &#8220;FIRE!&#8221; Perhaps, only those with good reason to speak could get a license from the government to speak. With this license the government could ensure that people don&#8217;t speak in sensitive places like schools, courthouses, and bars. Hey, does the pilot have a license to run a newspaper?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

