Comments on: Sporting Purposes http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/07/sporting-purposes-2/ The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ... Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:01:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ASM826 http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/07/sporting-purposes-2/#comment-31249 ASM826 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:30:08 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=5755#comment-31249 Molon Lave Molon Lave

]]> By: Danno http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/07/sporting-purposes-2/#comment-30987 Danno Wed, 08 Oct 2008 07:19:30 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=5755#comment-30987 Wow.. just wow. Well to each his own. My club insists on eye protection at all times on the property. I get the heebeegeebies just walking into a machine shop unprotected. The shooters I know and associate with, "Eyes and Ears" are rules five and six to to the four rules. I wouldn't even consider visiting a shooting range without protection. But hey, that's me. And my small "l" libertarian side easily agrees - it's your choice. But then I won't ride in a car without a seat belt, nor a motorcycle without a helmet while disagreeing with laws requiring same. BTW, I think you have some potential there: How about a BVD "safest sport in the world" match! you've already identified an obvious sponsor, and plenty of competitors and might even attract some TV(ESPN swimsuit) attention. That could bring some "interest" to the shooting sports! Wow.. just wow.

Well to each his own. My club insists on eye protection at all times on the property. I get the heebeegeebies just walking into a machine shop unprotected. The shooters I know and associate with, “Eyes and Ears” are rules five and six to to the four rules. I wouldn’t even consider visiting a shooting range without protection.

But hey, that’s me. And my small “l” libertarian side easily agrees – it’s your choice. But then I won’t ride in a car without a seat belt, nor a motorcycle without a helmet while disagreeing with laws requiring same.

BTW, I think you have some potential there: How about a BVD “safest sport in the world” match! you’ve already identified an obvious sponsor, and plenty of competitors and might even attract some TV(ESPN swimsuit) attention.

That could bring some “interest” to the shooting sports!

]]> By: Weer'd Beard http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/07/sporting-purposes-2/#comment-30980 Weer'd Beard Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:00:50 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=5755#comment-30980 Screw that, with the definition of "Barrel Shroud" HR 1022 will ban ALL semi-auto long arms. ALL OF THEM. I don't know of ANY semi-auto long-guns that have a fore-end that wouldn't be qualified as a "Barrel Shroud" by HR 1022 definition. Screw that, with the definition of “Barrel Shroud” HR 1022 will ban ALL semi-auto long arms.

ALL OF THEM. I don’t know of ANY semi-auto long-guns that have a fore-end that wouldn’t be qualified as a “Barrel Shroud” by HR 1022 definition.

]]> By: Robert http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/07/sporting-purposes-2/#comment-30979 Robert Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:33:07 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=5755#comment-30979 Eyes and ear protection required in the pits, Suggested on the line. It's the safest sport in the world even if we shot in our BVDs. Eyes and ear protection required in the pits, Suggested on the line. It’s the safest sport in the world even if we shot in our BVDs.

]]> By: Danno http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/10/07/sporting-purposes-2/#comment-30962 Danno Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:39:22 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=5755#comment-30962 Hmmm... Eye protection not required??? (Red ear muffs @ 4:20) Hmmm… Eye protection not required??? (Red ear muffs @ 4:20)

]]>