<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Sheriff in Town</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/08/12/new-sheriff-in-town/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/08/12/new-sheriff-in-town/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/08/12/new-sheriff-in-town/#comment-28278</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4569#comment-28278</guid>
		<description>This is essentially the policy in most of California, with the exception of parts of the Central Valley, and the northern and southeastern extremes of the state. The &quot;good cause&quot; requirement for issuance of a CCW is satisfied only when either:

(a) The applicant carries around large sums of cash as part of their job; or
(b) The applicant has been subjected to serious, credible threats of violent attack that law enforcement feels it can&#039;t adequately protect against.

As a practical matter, the only people who meet the &quot;good cause&quot; requirement under criterion (b) are celebrities and the politically-connected.

Welcome to may-issue California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is essentially the policy in most of California, with the exception of parts of the Central Valley, and the northern and southeastern extremes of the state. The &#8220;good cause&#8221; requirement for issuance of a CCW is satisfied only when either:</p>
<p>(a) The applicant carries around large sums of cash as part of their job; or<br />
(b) The applicant has been subjected to serious, credible threats of violent attack that law enforcement feels it can&#8217;t adequately protect against.</p>
<p>As a practical matter, the only people who meet the &#8220;good cause&#8221; requirement under criterion (b) are celebrities and the politically-connected.</p>
<p>Welcome to may-issue California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Schell</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/08/12/new-sheriff-in-town/#comment-28210</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Schell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4569#comment-28210</guid>
		<description>Sent her an email with some questions about how to know exactly when criminals are going to hit you so you can apply for a permit before they do with an acceptable good cause rationale.

No reply expected...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sent her an email with some questions about how to know exactly when criminals are going to hit you so you can apply for a permit before they do with an acceptable good cause rationale.</p>
<p>No reply expected&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: existingthing</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/08/12/new-sheriff-in-town/#comment-28170</link>
		<dc:creator>existingthing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4569#comment-28170</guid>
		<description>Previously approved, and currently in progress permits have yet to be rejected or revoked.

The recently published policy differs only slightly from the official policy under Carona, yet Carona allowed the non-business-related frequent transport of valuable goods (guns) to be a cause worthy of issuance. OC has not been &quot;shall issue&quot; for a long time.

At the moment though; the Carona scandal is still news, and since the media seems to think Carona was handing out CCWs like candy at a parade, I suspect most of these public releases are meant to make her public role in the story as positive as possible while the mostly anti-ccw media is still interested. I expect (or hope) that after the media loses interest, there will be a small release that publicly states that Carona did not abuse the CCW system as much as was assumed. Orange county is, for the most part, pro-ccw and Hutchens knows she will not be reelected if she changes the CCW status quo (favoritism excluded, of course :)) Orange county is one of the very few heavily populated california counties that actually issued CCWs, and losing it would be quite a loss.

The only wild card is that she came out of retirement to accept this appointment, and it is not known if she will even seek reelection. If she doesn&#039;t care about reelection, all bets are off.

I&#039;ll reserve my judgment for after I start seeing reports of revocations and rejections. Only last week did she reopen processing for the reportedly 2 foot high stack of CCW apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Previously approved, and currently in progress permits have yet to be rejected or revoked.</p>
<p>The recently published policy differs only slightly from the official policy under Carona, yet Carona allowed the non-business-related frequent transport of valuable goods (guns) to be a cause worthy of issuance. OC has not been &#8220;shall issue&#8221; for a long time.</p>
<p>At the moment though; the Carona scandal is still news, and since the media seems to think Carona was handing out CCWs like candy at a parade, I suspect most of these public releases are meant to make her public role in the story as positive as possible while the mostly anti-ccw media is still interested. I expect (or hope) that after the media loses interest, there will be a small release that publicly states that Carona did not abuse the CCW system as much as was assumed. Orange county is, for the most part, pro-ccw and Hutchens knows she will not be reelected if she changes the CCW status quo (favoritism excluded, of course :)) Orange county is one of the very few heavily populated california counties that actually issued CCWs, and losing it would be quite a loss.</p>
<p>The only wild card is that she came out of retirement to accept this appointment, and it is not known if she will even seek reelection. If she doesn&#8217;t care about reelection, all bets are off.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll reserve my judgment for after I start seeing reports of revocations and rejections. Only last week did she reopen processing for the reportedly 2 foot high stack of CCW apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CorbinKale</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/08/12/new-sheriff-in-town/#comment-28168</link>
		<dc:creator>CorbinKale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4569#comment-28168</guid>
		<description>I just sent her an email, since comments are disabled...

&quot;Citizens rights are such a pain. Since you can&#039;t be omniscient on who should be granted permission to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights, why worry about their 1st Amendment rights, either? I think you should just ignore the whole Constitution, as it will make your job so much easier. Citizens and their pesky rights! Who do they think they are... Law enforcement? We should all be considered criminals until we can prove our innocence and &#039;worthiness&#039; to you? Don&#039;t bother with a reply. Your ignorance of the Constitution and blatant disrespect of honest American citizens disgusts me.&quot;

Hopefully, her employment will not last long. Power corrupts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just sent her an email, since comments are disabled&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Citizens rights are such a pain. Since you can&#8217;t be omniscient on who should be granted permission to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights, why worry about their 1st Amendment rights, either? I think you should just ignore the whole Constitution, as it will make your job so much easier. Citizens and their pesky rights! Who do they think they are&#8230; Law enforcement? We should all be considered criminals until we can prove our innocence and &#8216;worthiness&#8217; to you? Don&#8217;t bother with a reply. Your ignorance of the Constitution and blatant disrespect of honest American citizens disgusts me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hopefully, her employment will not last long. Power corrupts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melancton Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/08/12/new-sheriff-in-town/#comment-28161</link>
		<dc:creator>Melancton Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4569#comment-28161</guid>
		<description>Obviously they had time to update the Sheriff&#039;s name and photo.   I think your ad hominen just ricocheted.

Thanks for playing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously they had time to update the Sheriff&#8217;s name and photo.   I think your ad hominen just ricocheted.</p>
<p>Thanks for playing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebronze</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/08/12/new-sheriff-in-town/#comment-28160</link>
		<dc:creator>thebronze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4569#comment-28160</guid>
		<description>It says &quot;his&quot; because it was instituted under Sheriff Corona.  Look at the date, instead of assuming that they&#039;re stupid.  I guess it shows who the stupid one is...

Obviously it hasn&#039;t been updated to reflect the new Sheriff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It says &#8220;his&#8221; because it was instituted under Sheriff Corona.  Look at the date, instead of assuming that they&#8217;re stupid.  I guess it shows who the stupid one is&#8230;</p>
<p>Obviously it hasn&#8217;t been updated to reflect the new Sheriff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike w.</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/08/12/new-sheriff-in-town/#comment-28159</link>
		<dc:creator>mike w.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4569#comment-28159</guid>
		<description>Chris - &quot;arbitrary &amp; capricious&quot; was my 1st thought.  We know damn well it&#039;ll be applied that way, and no doubt issuance of permits will end up being political.

If only we had incorporation....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; &#8220;arbitrary &amp; capricious&#8221; was my 1st thought.  We know damn well it&#8217;ll be applied that way, and no doubt issuance of permits will end up being political.</p>
<p>If only we had incorporation&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melancton Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/08/12/new-sheriff-in-town/#comment-28155</link>
		<dc:creator>Melancton Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4569#comment-28155</guid>
		<description>I especially liked this part in their explanation:

&lt;i&gt;Since the blog debuted, there have been several inquiries as to why comments are closed.  The purpose of this blog is to allow the Sheriff and &lt;b&gt;his&lt;/b&gt; staff to express their ideas and thoughts about the Department and items of interest that may involve or affect the Department.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I especially liked this part in their explanation:</p>
<p><i>Since the blog debuted, there have been several inquiries as to why comments are closed.  The purpose of this blog is to allow the Sheriff and <b>his</b> staff to express their ideas and thoughts about the Department and items of interest that may involve or affect the Department.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/08/12/new-sheriff-in-town/#comment-28146</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4569#comment-28146</guid>
		<description>sounds like an arbitrary and capricious licensing scheme to me... anyone in OC have a lawyer and a desire for a court battle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like an arbitrary and capricious licensing scheme to me&#8230; anyone in OC have a lawyer and a desire for a court battle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Denied &#124; GunBlogs.org</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/08/12/new-sheriff-in-town/#comment-28143</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Denied &#124; GunBlogs.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4569#comment-28143</guid>
		<description>[...] New Sheriff in Town [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Sheriff in Town [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

