Comments on: Are You Sure Senator?

By: cmblake6

cmblake6 — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:16:10 +0000

Realizing, of course, that the NJ/NY area is controlled by the demoncraps, and the demoncraps are beholden to “the mob”, and you can “fix” almost anything if you’ve got “people in the right places”, I wonder why the FBI, etc, haven’t come down on the organized crime so blatantly obviously in control OF that area/those states. This is blatant RICO prosecution territory.

By: Don

Don — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 01:04:37 +0000

If it were not for an “underhanded tactic”, New Jersey Democrat Frank Lautenberg would not even be in the Senate office he holds now.

Back in 2002, when the corrupt slimeball Democrat Bob Torricelli had to withdraw his candidacy for reelection in shame as the word got out about how much illegal money and gifts he had accepted from businessman David Chang, the Democrats in New Jersey illegally put Frank Lautenberg in Torricelli’s place, despite what state election laws said in regards to the deadline for ballot name changes prior to election day.

Ultimately, this inconvenient law did not matter to the Democrats in New Jersey, since the New Jersey Supreme Court, which was controlled by Democrat judges then and still is now, unanimously upheld the ballot name change from Torricelli’s to Lautenberg’s when the New Jersey Republicans challenged it in the courts. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up the case on appeal, which paved the way for Frank Lautenberg to defeat his Republican challenger, Doug Forrester by just 10% of the vote.

By: cmblake6

cmblake6 — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:02:22 +0000

A pox upon him and his ilk.

By: Jay

Jay — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:46:23 +0000

“Open and honest exchange of ideas” is something that does not exist in Frank Lautenberg’s world. The man is a tool.

By: Carl in Chicago

Carl in Chicago — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:37:59 +0000

Good grief these folks are milking this for more than it’s worth! Did the woman commit any crimes? Was the NRA paying her to commit these crimes or otherwise endorse criminal behavior? The answer, quite obviously, is no.

So why all the attention?

This is the best that the gun control movement has at this time.

By: illspirit

illspirit — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:43:58 +0000

Mmm.. Sounds like a witch hunt to me. So, yea, what will they do if a bunch of us write or call Lautenberg’s office and say ‘hi, I’m an NRA member, and I “spy” on gun banners’ or some such? Think he’ll subpoena all of us?

By: CemeteryCAS

CemeteryCAS — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:46:18 +0000

After reading that article, I ask, why do I have a feeling Lautenberg is gonna push for some sort of Congressional inquiry…………

Love his list of demands btw……….

By: cmblake6

cmblake6 — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:15:09 +0000

Come on now! We’re speaking of the LEFT, and their definition of “what IS is”.

By: Jim W

Jim W — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:41:05 +0000

Er, adding it to the prohibited persons list.

By: Jim W

Jim W — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:40:44 +0000

Isn’t he the cocksucker that got misdemeanor domestic violence snuck into a 1997 crime bill?