<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heller v. DC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/07/28/heller-v-dc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/07/28/heller-v-dc/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:03:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Heller</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/07/28/heller-v-dc/#comment-29135</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Heller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4299#comment-29135</guid>
		<description>REF:     This could get confusing « Firearms &amp; Freedom says: 

July 28th, 2008 at 6:18 pm      [...] could get confusing We had D.C. v. Heller, now we have Heller v. DC. Dick Heller is taking D.C. back to court, claiming that the new laws do not honor the [...]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

EXPLANATION:   The original case was our challange to the city &amp; was named  &quot;Parker, et al., vs. DC&quot; which later became  &quot;Heller [ I ]   vs. DC.&quot;  

When the city took their request  to the Supreme Court,  it was then THEIR  challange, hence,  &quot;DC  vs. Heller.&quot;

NOW, in the city&#039;s black spirit, we must RE-Challange them so it is again,
&quot;Heller (II)  vs. DC.&quot;

AND  --  Heller  III,  IV,  &amp;  V  are on the drawing board.

I&#039;m now just a security guard, 
surrounding myself with superior talent, 
as an indicator to let everyone know we can all 
strike back  @  hammer &amp; sickle  gov&#039;t ! !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REF:     This could get confusing « Firearms &amp; Freedom says: </p>
<p>July 28th, 2008 at 6:18 pm      [...] could get confusing We had D.C. v. Heller, now we have Heller v. DC. Dick Heller is taking D.C. back to court, claiming that the new laws do not honor the [...]<br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>EXPLANATION:   The original case was our challange to the city &amp; was named  &#8220;Parker, et al., vs. DC&#8221; which later became  &#8220;Heller [ I ]   vs. DC.&#8221;  </p>
<p>When the city took their request  to the Supreme Court,  it was then THEIR  challange, hence,  &#8220;DC  vs. Heller.&#8221;</p>
<p>NOW, in the city&#8217;s black spirit, we must RE-Challange them so it is again,<br />
&#8220;Heller (II)  vs. DC.&#8221;</p>
<p>AND  &#8212;  Heller  III,  IV,  &amp;  V  are on the drawing board.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m now just a security guard,<br />
surrounding myself with superior talent,<br />
as an indicator to let everyone know we can all<br />
strike back  @  hammer &amp; sickle  gov&#8217;t ! !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Arizona Rifleman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Heller sues DC</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/07/28/heller-v-dc/#comment-27449</link>
		<dc:creator>The Arizona Rifleman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Heller sues DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4299#comment-27449</guid>
		<description>[...] (Hat tip to Sebastian.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Hat tip to Sebastian.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right To Bear Arms &#187; Go Get Them Mr. Heller</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/07/28/heller-v-dc/#comment-27433</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right To Bear Arms &#187; Go Get Them Mr. Heller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4299#comment-27433</guid>
		<description>[...] Dick Heller is suing Washington DC again. Per Sebastian, Heller is seeking an injunction against DC&#8217;s: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dick Heller is suing Washington DC again. Per Sebastian, Heller is seeking an injunction against DC&#8217;s: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/07/28/heller-v-dc/#comment-27396</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl in Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4299#comment-27396</guid>
		<description>Halbrook is 4-0 in front of the Supreme Court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halbrook is 4-0 in front of the Supreme Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/07/28/heller-v-dc/#comment-27390</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4299#comment-27390</guid>
		<description>Well, Heller&#039;s first attorney was Alan Gura, who is now off harassing Chicago.  He has a new set of attorneys for this case.  But he&#039;s still in capable hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Heller&#8217;s first attorney was Alan Gura, who is now off harassing Chicago.  He has a new set of attorneys for this case.  But he&#8217;s still in capable hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/07/28/heller-v-dc/#comment-27389</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4299#comment-27389</guid>
		<description>I am quite sure that there is a long term plan in play, i just do not know what it is. I have decided that Heller&#039;s attorney is one shrewd SOB and i would hate to have to face him in a court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am quite sure that there is a long term plan in play, i just do not know what it is. I have decided that Heller&#8217;s attorney is one shrewd SOB and i would hate to have to face him in a court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob K</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/07/28/heller-v-dc/#comment-27359</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4299#comment-27359</guid>
		<description>Anybody else notice who the 3rd plaintiff listed is? AMY McVEY, the first new DC licensee. I think there may be a long term plan in play...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody else notice who the 3rd plaintiff listed is? AMY McVEY, the first new DC licensee. I think there may be a long term plan in play&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/07/28/heller-v-dc/#comment-27357</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4299#comment-27357</guid>
		<description>I think itis time for Sabastian to rename the blog to &quot;Snowflakes in Heller&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think itis time for Sabastian to rename the blog to &#8220;Snowflakes in Heller&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Call me Ahab &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Heller round 2: Electric Boogaloo</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/07/28/heller-v-dc/#comment-27348</link>
		<dc:creator>Call me Ahab &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Heller round 2: Electric Boogaloo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4299#comment-27348</guid>
		<description>[...] Mr. Heller is suing DC again, because, well, their new laws really aren&#8217;t that different from the old laws. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mr. Heller is suing DC again, because, well, their new laws really aren&#8217;t that different from the old laws. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ParatrooperJJ</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/07/28/heller-v-dc/#comment-27347</link>
		<dc:creator>ParatrooperJJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=4299#comment-27347</guid>
		<description>Why would they not wait until the final orders from Heller are released?  These restrictions might be overturned by the appellate or district court?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would they not wait until the final orders from Heller are released?  These restrictions might be overturned by the appellate or district court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

