<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prosecutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/04/09/prosecutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/04/09/prosecutions/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:54:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Turk Turon</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/04/09/prosecutions/#comment-21222</link>
		<dc:creator>Turk Turon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=3167#comment-21222</guid>
		<description>EXACTLY! The crooks are already using false reports of thefts and burglaries as a cover for sales of guns to felons - at least three of them in this story. So what point is there in a law that would require such reports?

The SCOTUS has already ruled (Haynes? In 1969?) that the gov&#039;t cannot require criminals to register their guns because it violates the Fifth Amendment. So I think a good case could be made that proposals to punish gun-owners who fail to report &lt;i&gt;legitimate&lt;/i&gt; thefts would target only the law-abiding and not those whom the law claims to target: felons selling guns on the black market.

The real purpose of such laws (and so many others) was laid out in the now-infamous 1976 New Yorker interview with Pete Shields, the founder od Handgun Control, Inc: to slowly, slowly, tighten the noose; using regulations, licenses, taxes, fees, and the media, until nobody could AFFORD to own a handgun, at which point it would be easy to pass a law to ban them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXACTLY! The crooks are already using false reports of thefts and burglaries as a cover for sales of guns to felons &#8211; at least three of them in this story. So what point is there in a law that would require such reports?</p>
<p>The SCOTUS has already ruled (Haynes? In 1969?) that the gov&#8217;t cannot require criminals to register their guns because it violates the Fifth Amendment. So I think a good case could be made that proposals to punish gun-owners who fail to report <i>legitimate</i> thefts would target only the law-abiding and not those whom the law claims to target: felons selling guns on the black market.</p>
<p>The real purpose of such laws (and so many others) was laid out in the now-infamous 1976 New Yorker interview with Pete Shields, the founder od Handgun Control, Inc: to slowly, slowly, tighten the noose; using regulations, licenses, taxes, fees, and the media, until nobody could AFFORD to own a handgun, at which point it would be easy to pass a law to ban them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

