Comments on: More on Nebraska Issue http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/ The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ... Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:53:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Sebastian http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20253 Sebastian Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:37:09 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20253 I see what you're saying... but it's two different bodies of law. Section 5 repeals the original 69-2409.01 from the Reissue Revised Statutes, which <a href="http://uniweb.legislature.ne.gov/LegalDocs/view.php?page=s6924009001" rel="nofollow">you can see here</a>. That's different from the part that was repealed outright, which is 69-2409, <a href="http://uniweb.legislature.ne.gov/LegalDocs/view.php?page=s6924009000" rel="nofollow">which you can see here</a>. It looks like 69-2409.01 a subsection of 69-2409, because you're thinking like a sensible human being rather than a politician :) They are distinct. Legislators aren't always smart in how they choose to organize bodies of law. In fact, it's usually not done in a well thought out manner. I'll tag that whole thing with the disclaimer that if you really want a definitive answer, you should ask someone licensed to practice law in Nebraska. I see what you’re saying… but it’s two different bodies of law. Section 5 repeals the original 69-2409.01 from the Reissue Revised Statutes, which you can see here. That’s different from the part that was repealed outright, which is 69-2409, which you can see here.

It looks like 69-2409.01 a subsection of 69-2409, because you’re thinking like a sensible human being rather than a politician :) They are distinct. Legislators aren’t always smart in how they choose to organize bodies of law. In fact, it’s usually not done in a well thought out manner.

I’ll tag that whole thing with the disclaimer that if you really want a definitive answer, you should ask someone licensed to practice law in Nebraska.

]]> By: CTLCatfish http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20252 CTLCatfish Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:24:23 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20252 section 5 repeals then replaces, section6 then repeals it's done twice... section 5 repeals then replaces, section6 then repeals it’s done twice…

]]> By: Sebastian http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20251 Sebastian Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:24:12 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20251 Ah, OK... yes. I see where you're talking about now. But that section doesn't repeal it, as in gets it off the books, it repeals it, and replaces it with the revisions outlined in the previous section. Ah, OK… yes. I see where you’re talking about now. But that section doesn’t repeal it, as in gets it off the books, it repeals it, and replaces it with the revisions outlined in the previous section.

]]> By: CTLCatfish http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20250 CTLCatfish Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:48:02 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20250 One of the Crime Commission’s job is to act on the Governor’s behalf and recommend legislation, if they are recommending legislation with based on a study they performed it basically walks through the statehouse. In order to stop this type of problem the study needs to be rewritten to be more balanced. One of the Crime Commission’s job is to act on the Governor’s behalf and recommend legislation, if they are recommending legislation with based on a study they performed it basically walks through the statehouse. In order to stop this type of problem the study needs to be rewritten to be more balanced.

]]> By: CTLCatfish http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20249 CTLCatfish Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:42:20 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20249 Section 5 of the amendment 2235 removes old languge so new is inserted, then Section 6 strikes everything to do with the old permit to purchase including the just ammended section ... could be a legeslative writer screw-up or with Ashford it could be on purpose. Section 5 of the amendment 2235 removes old languge so new is inserted, then Section 6 strikes everything to do with the old permit to purchase including the just ammended section … could be a legeslative writer screw-up or with Ashford it could be on purpose.

]]> By: Sebastian http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20247 Sebastian Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:57:02 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20247 Where are you seeing that? I have a copy of the legislative record before me and I only see a modification to one section of it. In fact, that section is referenced in other parts of the amendment. Where are you seeing that? I have a copy of the legislative record before me and I only see a modification to one section of it. In fact, that section is referenced in other parts of the amendment.

]]> By: CTLCatfish http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20245 CTLCatfish Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:46:20 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20245 Sec. 6. The following sections are outright repealed: 4 Sections 69-2401, 69-2403, 69-2407, 69-2708, 69-2409, 69-2412, 5 69-2413, 69-2414, 69-2415, 69-2416, 69-2417, 69-2420, 69-2421, 6 69-2422, 69-2423, 69-2424, and 69-2425, Reissue Revised Statutes 7 of Nebraska, and sections 69-2402, 69-2404, 69-2405, 69-2406, 8 69-2410, 69-2411, 69-2418, and 69-2419, Revised Statutes Cumulative 9 Supplement, 2006. The entire section 69-2409 is being struck Sec. 6. The following sections are outright repealed:
4 Sections 69-2401, 69-2403, 69-2407, 69-2708, 69-2409, 69-2412,
5 69-2413, 69-2414, 69-2415, 69-2416, 69-2417, 69-2420, 69-2421,
6 69-2422, 69-2423, 69-2424, and 69-2425, Reissue Revised Statutes
7 of Nebraska, and sections 69-2402, 69-2404, 69-2405, 69-2406,
8 69-2410, 69-2411, 69-2418, and 69-2419, Revised Statutes Cumulative
9 Supplement, 2006.

The entire section 69-2409 is being struck

]]> By: Sebastian http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20244 Sebastian Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:42:43 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20244 It didn't strike the whole thing, only the second part. It's no longer relevant if you don't have permits to purchase anymore. It didn’t strike the whole thing, only the second part. It’s no longer relevant if you don’t have permits to purchase anymore.

]]> By: CTLCatfish http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20243 CTLCatfish Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:40:06 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20243 Yes Sebastian 69-2409.1 does protect against delving into personal records, to bad LB 958 is striking that from the statutes. Yes Sebastian 69-2409.1 does protect against delving into personal records, to bad LB 958 is striking that from the statutes.

]]> By: Sebastian http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20242 Sebastian Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:36:58 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/13/more-on-nebraska-issue/#comment-20242 Can they enact legislation? As far as I can tell all they can do is issue a report that the legislature may take into consideration. What I'm saying is take the chance to repeal, and fight those battles when they come up. Can they enact legislation? As far as I can tell all they can do is issue a report that the legislature may take into consideration. What I’m saying is take the chance to repeal, and fight those battles when they come up.

]]>