Comments on: AR-15 Controversey in Duncannon

By: chris

chris — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:01:38 +0000

“The cost was $1,599.90 for the rifles and $138.45 for two cases of ammunition”

i wanna know where i can get ammo that cheap!!!

By: Claude

Claude — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:32:48 +0000

This is what happens when we elect linguini-spined people to represent us, regardless of level of government. I wonder if criminals will also lock away their rifles while the “dispute” is resolved.

By: Sebastian

Sebastian — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:59:26 +0000

There is no blanket authority known as “citizens arrest”. You’re treading on dangerous ground there. Under most state laws people have the power to use force to detain someone who they’ve witnessed committing a felony. Misdemeanors and lesser offenses are different matters entirely depending on the state.

Citizens get no qualified immunity, so it’s very very risky for ordinary people to do.

By: DirtCrashr

DirtCrashr — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:58:31 +0000

I really-really-rally like my Noveske upper… :-)

By: kaveman

kaveman — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:28:23 +0000

Where citizens have the authority to make “citizens arrests”, what purpose do the police serve?

By: straightarrow

straightarrow — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:07:23 +0000

Gang members have proven to be the least responsible gun possessors in the nation. Are we sure we want this gang armed at all?

By: Carl in Chicago

Carl in Chicago — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:44:39 +0000

Rifles? Oh my…

“We don’t want the police to have them…ergo…we SURE don’t want other civiliains to have them.”