<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nifty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/01/15/nifty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/01/15/nifty/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:26:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/01/15/nifty/#comment-17666</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2424#comment-17666</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see anything wrong with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.easybackgroundchecks.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;background checks&lt;/a&gt;, I&#039;m sure it has some effect, but the real root of the problem isn&#039;t gonna be solved that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with <a href="http://www.easybackgroundchecks.com" rel="nofollow">background checks</a>, I&#8217;m sure it has some effect, but the real root of the problem isn&#8217;t gonna be solved that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/01/15/nifty/#comment-17651</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2424#comment-17651</guid>
		<description>Yeah... I don&#039;t think they know what the word means.  And the irony if it is, I&#039;d be willing to think about trading private sales as long as I got something significant for it in return... like repeal of The Hughes Amendment, or elimination of the sporting purposes clause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230; I don&#8217;t think they know what the word means.  And the irony if it is, I&#8217;d be willing to think about trading private sales as long as I got something significant for it in return&#8230; like repeal of The Hughes Amendment, or elimination of the sporting purposes clause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike w.</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2008/01/15/nifty/#comment-17650</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike w.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2424#comment-17650</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s that word &quot;Compromise&quot; again in the Wapo article you linked to.  I&#039;m sorry, but a &quot;compromise&quot; means the other side gives up something as well.  Making it illegal for me to purchase from a private party isn&#039;t a compromise, it&#039;s a restriction that serves no purpose.

of course I&#039;m preaching to the choir here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s that word &#8220;Compromise&#8221; again in the Wapo article you linked to.  I&#8217;m sorry, but a &#8220;compromise&#8221; means the other side gives up something as well.  Making it illegal for me to purchase from a private party isn&#8217;t a compromise, it&#8217;s a restriction that serves no purpose.</p>
<p>of course I&#8217;m preaching to the choir here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

