<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wedge Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/11/26/wedge-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/11/26/wedge-issue/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:40:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/11/26/wedge-issue/#comment-15115</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1993#comment-15115</guid>
		<description>Any of those 4 will simply lie and say they support the 2nd Amendment rights of Americans but then revert back to their usual gun-grabbing once elected.  I&#039;d put money on it.   None of them have ANY respect whatsoever for gun owners or the 2nd Amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any of those 4 will simply lie and say they support the 2nd Amendment rights of Americans but then revert back to their usual gun-grabbing once elected.  I&#8217;d put money on it.   None of them have ANY respect whatsoever for gun owners or the 2nd Amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straightarrow</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/11/26/wedge-issue/#comment-15102</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1993#comment-15102</guid>
		<description>I would prefer having gonnorhea to having Clinton, Obama, Giuliani, or Romney as president. 

Gonnorhea is a lot more fun to get, has fewer deleterious effects, and is more socially acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would prefer having gonnorhea to having Clinton, Obama, Giuliani, or Romney as president. </p>
<p>Gonnorhea is a lot more fun to get, has fewer deleterious effects, and is more socially acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BadIdeaGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/11/26/wedge-issue/#comment-15094</link>
		<dc:creator>BadIdeaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1993#comment-15094</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d concur on the original sentiment. If Rudy/Mitt would sign an AW ban, I&#039;ve no need to vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d concur on the original sentiment. If Rudy/Mitt would sign an AW ban, I&#8217;ve no need to vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeH</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/11/26/wedge-issue/#comment-15088</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1993#comment-15088</guid>
		<description>It may get trickier for the dems than that if we prevail in Heller.

The Move On / Brady Bunch loons will demand a constitutional amendment to cancel the 2nd amendment.  A party platform that calls for canceling a part of the Bill of Rights is going to be a very hard sell in the general election.  Even normal liberals will choke on that slippery slope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may get trickier for the dems than that if we prevail in Heller.</p>
<p>The Move On / Brady Bunch loons will demand a constitutional amendment to cancel the 2nd amendment.  A party platform that calls for canceling a part of the Bill of Rights is going to be a very hard sell in the general election.  Even normal liberals will choke on that slippery slope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

