<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Answer Me This</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/31/answer-me-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/31/answer-me-this/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:54:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/31/answer-me-this/#comment-8541</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 21:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1182#comment-8541</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TXGunGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/31/answer-me-this/#comment-8538</link>
		<dc:creator>TXGunGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 21:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1182#comment-8538</guid>
		<description>Actually it is because of leading. As you push the bulklet down the barrel faster you get maore friction/heat and more leading. The copper wash does help to reduce that. Subsonic and Match don&#039;t often have this since the velocities are lower and don&#039;t lead to as much leading. The reason for not copper washing standard and subsonic rounds is simple economics. The cost of mass producing copper washed bullets even at fractions of a cent per round get big when you are making billions of rounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it is because of leading. As you push the bulklet down the barrel faster you get maore friction/heat and more leading. The copper wash does help to reduce that. Subsonic and Match don&#8217;t often have this since the velocities are lower and don&#8217;t lead to as much leading. The reason for not copper washing standard and subsonic rounds is simple economics. The cost of mass producing copper washed bullets even at fractions of a cent per round get big when you are making billions of rounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/31/answer-me-this/#comment-8535</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1182#comment-8535</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what I heard GeorgeH, but that seems to imply it&#039;s still a problem with standard velocity.  So why not plate standard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I heard GeorgeH, but that seems to imply it&#8217;s still a problem with standard velocity.  So why not plate standard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeH</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/31/answer-me-this/#comment-8517</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1182#comment-8517</guid>
		<description>The higher the velocity, the more leading becomes a problem. The copper wash may help control it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The higher the velocity, the more leading becomes a problem. The copper wash may help control it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobG</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/31/answer-me-this/#comment-8512</link>
		<dc:creator>BobG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1182#comment-8512</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found that some autoloaders don&#039;t do well with lead ammo, since it is soft and can sometimes snag when feeding.  Never had that problem with jacketed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found that some autoloaders don&#8217;t do well with lead ammo, since it is soft and can sometimes snag when feeding.  Never had that problem with jacketed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/31/answer-me-this/#comment-8465</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1182#comment-8465</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had fantastic luck with the Remington &quot;Golden Bullet&quot; in my Ruger Mark III 22.45. Very few jams and feeds very well. On my no-name rifle, it works fairly well. In both, the ammo is accurate for what I use it for. At 100 yards on the rifle, open sites, I can hit the target. I&#039;m sure if I used bags or a Lead Sled I could have decent groupings, but I prefer to hand hold because in a SHTF moment, I doubt I&#039;m going to be in a prone position.

CCI high velocity suck the life out of my pistol. I&#039;ve not shot them in the rifle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had fantastic luck with the Remington &#8220;Golden Bullet&#8221; in my Ruger Mark III 22.45. Very few jams and feeds very well. On my no-name rifle, it works fairly well. In both, the ammo is accurate for what I use it for. At 100 yards on the rifle, open sites, I can hit the target. I&#8217;m sure if I used bags or a Lead Sled I could have decent groupings, but I prefer to hand hold because in a SHTF moment, I doubt I&#8217;m going to be in a prone position.</p>
<p>CCI high velocity suck the life out of my pistol. I&#8217;ve not shot them in the rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/31/answer-me-this/#comment-8423</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1182#comment-8423</guid>
		<description>Copper plating is just a &quot;wow, looks cool&quot; sales gimic.  It does nothing for ballistics or accuracy.  If you&#039;ve tricked out your 10-22, then I suggest picking up various &quot;target&quot; grade ammo for practice, but using something like Eley 10X for competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copper plating is just a &#8220;wow, looks cool&#8221; sales gimic.  It does nothing for ballistics or accuracy.  If you&#8217;ve tricked out your 10-22, then I suggest picking up various &#8220;target&#8221; grade ammo for practice, but using something like Eley 10X for competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longhorn</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/31/answer-me-this/#comment-8418</link>
		<dc:creator>Longhorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 03:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1182#comment-8418</guid>
		<description>I am sorry to say I can not answer your question but my 10/22 will only feed the copper plated ammo.  I always thought it was because of the copper plated bullet....mabey it just likes high velocity ammo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry to say I can not answer your question but my 10/22 will only feed the copper plated ammo.  I always thought it was because of the copper plated bullet&#8230;.mabey it just likes high velocity ammo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

