<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bradys Bad Mouthing Good Gun Shops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/bradys-bad-mouthing-good-gun-shops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/bradys-bad-mouthing-good-gun-shops/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/bradys-bad-mouthing-good-gun-shops/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=209#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>Sebastian~  I&#039;m a college student working on a paper about Gun liability lawsuits relating ot the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.  I was wondering if you are aware of any gun ownership statistics particularly for Bucks County. (My paper is to &quot;write our Congressman&quot;)  If you can give me any help it would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sebastian~  I&#8217;m a college student working on a paper about Gun liability lawsuits relating ot the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.  I was wondering if you are aware of any gun ownership statistics particularly for Bucks County. (My paper is to &#8220;write our Congressman&#8221;)  If you can give me any help it would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straightarrow</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/bradys-bad-mouthing-good-gun-shops/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=209#comment-402</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if this is true, but I would think one test of strawman would be whether the actual purchaser was reimbursed for the cost of the weapon by the end recipient.  If so, straw purchase, if not, gift. That would be my take on it. perhaps it makes too much sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if this is true, but I would think one test of strawman would be whether the actual purchaser was reimbursed for the cost of the weapon by the end recipient.  If so, straw purchase, if not, gift. That would be my take on it. perhaps it makes too much sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/bradys-bad-mouthing-good-gun-shops/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=209#comment-400</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to keep them in mind next time I&#039;m in the market.  Definitely after this, they deserve to have some of my money headed their way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to keep them in mind next time I&#8217;m in the market.  Definitely after this, they deserve to have some of my money headed their way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wally</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/bradys-bad-mouthing-good-gun-shops/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Wally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=209#comment-399</guid>
		<description>I bought a rifle at Tanners almost two years ago.  It is a reputable operation with a courteous and professional staff.  If you live near Bucks County and are in the market for a firearm, I can highly recommend them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a rifle at Tanners almost two years ago.  It is a reputable operation with a courteous and professional staff.  If you live near Bucks County and are in the market for a firearm, I can highly recommend them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hardy</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/bradys-bad-mouthing-good-gun-shops/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=209#comment-394</guid>
		<description>One big problem is that it&#039;s hard to define just what a straw man sale is.

I buy a gun and give it to someone as a gift ... that&#039;s OK.

I buy a gun &quot;for&quot; someone else ... that&#039;s forbidden.

Hard to see a clear line between the two, and ATF itself has tried without too much success to define it. At one point they said that the line was whether the ultimate recipient could not legally possess (note possess, not buy from a dealer, because the underage can&#039;t buy from a dealer but can possess). It was a practical dividing line, but hard to reconcile logically with the statute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One big problem is that it&#8217;s hard to define just what a straw man sale is.</p>
<p>I buy a gun and give it to someone as a gift &#8230; that&#8217;s OK.</p>
<p>I buy a gun &#8220;for&#8221; someone else &#8230; that&#8217;s forbidden.</p>
<p>Hard to see a clear line between the two, and ATF itself has tried without too much success to define it. At one point they said that the line was whether the ultimate recipient could not legally possess (note possess, not buy from a dealer, because the underage can&#8217;t buy from a dealer but can possess). It was a practical dividing line, but hard to reconcile logically with the statute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/bradys-bad-mouthing-good-gun-shops/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=209#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Congrats on the Instalanche!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on the Instalanche!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bitch Girls :: Bloglines Still Not Fixing Problem, But I Have a Solution</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/bradys-bad-mouthing-good-gun-shops/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bitch Girls :: Bloglines Still Not Fixing Problem, But I Have a Solution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=209#comment-392</guid>
		<description>[...] - He&#8217;s got a great post and link to a story about a gun shop that the Brady Bunch unfairly accused of making illegal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; He&#8217;s got a great post and link to a story about a gun shop that the Brady Bunch unfairly accused of making illegal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straightarrow</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/bradys-bad-mouthing-good-gun-shops/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=209#comment-387</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t you think Sarah would know better?  Didn&#039;t she defend her purchase of gun she gave to her son as a gift? Why! I believe she did. How &#039;bout dat.

And she got all irate about being questioned about it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you think Sarah would know better?  Didn&#8217;t she defend her purchase of gun she gave to her son as a gift? Why! I believe she did. How &#8217;bout dat.</p>
<p>And she got all irate about being questioned about it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; When gun shops do good</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/bradys-bad-mouthing-good-gun-shops/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; When gun shops do good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=209#comment-385</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Ownership embarasses itself: Which is what happened last month when the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence released a report, “Shady Dealings: Illegal Gun Trafficking from Licensed Gun Dealers.” Tanner’s store was featured as one of the scurrilous. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/bradys-bad-mouthing-good-gun-shops/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=209#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Excellent letter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent letter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

