<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Promotion &#8211; Crime and Federalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/blog-promotion-crime-and-federalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/blog-promotion-crime-and-federalism/</link>
	<description>The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: straightarrow</title>
		<link>http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/02/16/blog-promotion-crime-and-federalism/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=207#comment-386</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t easy to break the law without knowing it.  It is inevitable and unavoidable.

I will never and have never voted for a law and order candidate. If I ever hear of a candidate that supports law and disorder, he has my vote.  Why?  Because people are not orderly, obeying the law and observing the courtesies and considerations due others should be enough.  If people are orderly, they are being forced.  In other words they are being punished for followinig their own lights.  Note, I did say we each owe the other courtesy and consideration of their rights.  Law can be useful as a deterrent for the violation of such.  But law that enforces order is itself a violation those tenets of a free people almost always.

I like to pose this question on occassion.  Can you name one thing you can do that is not governed, regulated, taxed or prohibited by the state unless you break the law?  Anything at all?   So far, no one has come up with anything that a restriction of free will over it can&#039;t be found.  Overt acts only, not thinking about it.  

Shit, sometimes I depress myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t easy to break the law without knowing it.  It is inevitable and unavoidable.</p>
<p>I will never and have never voted for a law and order candidate. If I ever hear of a candidate that supports law and disorder, he has my vote.  Why?  Because people are not orderly, obeying the law and observing the courtesies and considerations due others should be enough.  If people are orderly, they are being forced.  In other words they are being punished for followinig their own lights.  Note, I did say we each owe the other courtesy and consideration of their rights.  Law can be useful as a deterrent for the violation of such.  But law that enforces order is itself a violation those tenets of a free people almost always.</p>
<p>I like to pose this question on occassion.  Can you name one thing you can do that is not governed, regulated, taxed or prohibited by the state unless you break the law?  Anything at all?   So far, no one has come up with anything that a restriction of free will over it can&#8217;t be found.  Overt acts only, not thinking about it.  </p>
<p>Shit, sometimes I depress myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

